linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.1 080/202] dm btree: add ref counting ops for the leaves of top level btrees

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20151018014905.591577554@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:	Sat, 17 Oct 2015 18:57:43 -0700
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, Joe Thornber <ejt@...hat.com>,
	Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.1 080/202] dm btree: add ref counting ops for the leaves of top level btrees

4.1-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Joe Thornber <ejt@...hat.com>

commit b0dc3c8bc157c60b1d470163882be8c13e1950af upstream.

When using nested btrees, the top leaves of the top levels contain
block addresses for the root of the next tree down.  If we shadow a
shared leaf node the leaf values (sub tree roots) should be incremented
accordingly.

This is only an issue if there is metadata sharing in the top levels.
Which only occurs if metadata snapshots are being used (as is possible
with dm-thinp).  And could result in a block from the thinp metadata
snap being reused early, thus corrupting the thinp metadata snap.

Signed-off-by: Joe Thornber <ejt@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/md/persistent-data/dm-btree-internal.h |    6 ++++
 drivers/md/persistent-data/dm-btree-remove.c   |   12 ++------
 drivers/md/persistent-data/dm-btree-spine.c    |   37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/md/persistent-data/dm-btree.c          |    7 ----
 4 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/md/persistent-data/dm-btree-internal.h
+++ b/drivers/md/persistent-data/dm-btree-internal.h
@@ -138,4 +138,10 @@ int lower_bound(struct btree_node *n, ui
 
 extern struct dm_block_validator btree_node_validator;
 
+/*
+ * Value type for upper levels of multi-level btrees.
+ */
+extern void init_le64_type(struct dm_transaction_manager *tm,
+			   struct dm_btree_value_type *vt);
+
 #endif	/* DM_BTREE_INTERNAL_H */
--- a/drivers/md/persistent-data/dm-btree-remove.c
+++ b/drivers/md/persistent-data/dm-btree-remove.c
@@ -544,14 +544,6 @@ static int remove_raw(struct shadow_spin
 	return r;
 }
 
-static struct dm_btree_value_type le64_type = {
-	.context = NULL,
-	.size = sizeof(__le64),
-	.inc = NULL,
-	.dec = NULL,
-	.equal = NULL
-};
-
 int dm_btree_remove(struct dm_btree_info *info, dm_block_t root,
 		    uint64_t *keys, dm_block_t *new_root)
 {
@@ -559,12 +551,14 @@ int dm_btree_remove(struct dm_btree_info
 	int index = 0, r = 0;
 	struct shadow_spine spine;
 	struct btree_node *n;
+	struct dm_btree_value_type le64_vt;
 
+	init_le64_type(info->tm, &le64_vt);
 	init_shadow_spine(&spine, info);
 	for (level = 0; level < info->levels; level++) {
 		r = remove_raw(&spine, info,
 			       (level == last_level ?
-				&info->value_type : &le64_type),
+				&info->value_type : &le64_vt),
 			       root, keys[level], (unsigned *)&index);
 		if (r < 0)
 			break;
--- a/drivers/md/persistent-data/dm-btree-spine.c
+++ b/drivers/md/persistent-data/dm-btree-spine.c
@@ -249,3 +249,40 @@ int shadow_root(struct shadow_spine *s)
 {
 	return s->root;
 }
+
+static void le64_inc(void *context, const void *value_le)
+{
+	struct dm_transaction_manager *tm = context;
+	__le64 v_le;
+
+	memcpy(&v_le, value_le, sizeof(v_le));
+	dm_tm_inc(tm, le64_to_cpu(v_le));
+}
+
+static void le64_dec(void *context, const void *value_le)
+{
+	struct dm_transaction_manager *tm = context;
+	__le64 v_le;
+
+	memcpy(&v_le, value_le, sizeof(v_le));
+	dm_tm_dec(tm, le64_to_cpu(v_le));
+}
+
+static int le64_equal(void *context, const void *value1_le, const void *value2_le)
+{
+	__le64 v1_le, v2_le;
+
+	memcpy(&v1_le, value1_le, sizeof(v1_le));
+	memcpy(&v2_le, value2_le, sizeof(v2_le));
+	return v1_le == v2_le;
+}
+
+void init_le64_type(struct dm_transaction_manager *tm,
+		    struct dm_btree_value_type *vt)
+{
+	vt->context = tm;
+	vt->size = sizeof(__le64);
+	vt->inc = le64_inc;
+	vt->dec = le64_dec;
+	vt->equal = le64_equal;
+}
--- a/drivers/md/persistent-data/dm-btree.c
+++ b/drivers/md/persistent-data/dm-btree.c
@@ -667,12 +667,7 @@ static int insert(struct dm_btree_info *
 	struct btree_node *n;
 	struct dm_btree_value_type le64_type;
 
-	le64_type.context = NULL;
-	le64_type.size = sizeof(__le64);
-	le64_type.inc = NULL;
-	le64_type.dec = NULL;
-	le64_type.equal = NULL;
-
+	init_le64_type(info->tm, &le64_type);
 	init_shadow_spine(&spine, info);
 
 	for (level = 0; level < (info->levels - 1); level++) {


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/