[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20151018014907.202799331@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2015 18:58:19 -0700
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Manfred Spraul <manfred@...orfullife.com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@...e.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.1 116/202] Initialize msg/shm IPC objects before doing ipc_addid()
4.1-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
commit b9a532277938798b53178d5a66af6e2915cb27cf upstream.
As reported by Dmitry Vyukov, we really shouldn't do ipc_addid() before
having initialized the IPC object state. Yes, we initialize the IPC
object in a locked state, but with all the lockless RCU lookup work,
that IPC object lock no longer means that the state cannot be seen.
We already did this for the IPC semaphore code (see commit e8577d1f0329:
"ipc/sem.c: fully initialize sem_array before making it visible") but we
clearly forgot about msg and shm.
Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
Cc: Manfred Spraul <manfred@...orfullife.com>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@...e.de>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
ipc/msg.c | 14 +++++++-------
ipc/shm.c | 13 +++++++------
ipc/util.c | 8 ++++----
3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
--- a/ipc/msg.c
+++ b/ipc/msg.c
@@ -137,13 +137,6 @@ static int newque(struct ipc_namespace *
return retval;
}
- /* ipc_addid() locks msq upon success. */
- id = ipc_addid(&msg_ids(ns), &msq->q_perm, ns->msg_ctlmni);
- if (id < 0) {
- ipc_rcu_putref(msq, msg_rcu_free);
- return id;
- }
-
msq->q_stime = msq->q_rtime = 0;
msq->q_ctime = get_seconds();
msq->q_cbytes = msq->q_qnum = 0;
@@ -153,6 +146,13 @@ static int newque(struct ipc_namespace *
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&msq->q_receivers);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&msq->q_senders);
+ /* ipc_addid() locks msq upon success. */
+ id = ipc_addid(&msg_ids(ns), &msq->q_perm, ns->msg_ctlmni);
+ if (id < 0) {
+ ipc_rcu_putref(msq, msg_rcu_free);
+ return id;
+ }
+
ipc_unlock_object(&msq->q_perm);
rcu_read_unlock();
--- a/ipc/shm.c
+++ b/ipc/shm.c
@@ -550,12 +550,6 @@ static int newseg(struct ipc_namespace *
if (IS_ERR(file))
goto no_file;
- id = ipc_addid(&shm_ids(ns), &shp->shm_perm, ns->shm_ctlmni);
- if (id < 0) {
- error = id;
- goto no_id;
- }
-
shp->shm_cprid = task_tgid_vnr(current);
shp->shm_lprid = 0;
shp->shm_atim = shp->shm_dtim = 0;
@@ -564,6 +558,13 @@ static int newseg(struct ipc_namespace *
shp->shm_nattch = 0;
shp->shm_file = file;
shp->shm_creator = current;
+
+ id = ipc_addid(&shm_ids(ns), &shp->shm_perm, ns->shm_ctlmni);
+ if (id < 0) {
+ error = id;
+ goto no_id;
+ }
+
list_add(&shp->shm_clist, ¤t->sysvshm.shm_clist);
/*
--- a/ipc/util.c
+++ b/ipc/util.c
@@ -237,6 +237,10 @@ int ipc_addid(struct ipc_ids *ids, struc
rcu_read_lock();
spin_lock(&new->lock);
+ current_euid_egid(&euid, &egid);
+ new->cuid = new->uid = euid;
+ new->gid = new->cgid = egid;
+
id = idr_alloc(&ids->ipcs_idr, new,
(next_id < 0) ? 0 : ipcid_to_idx(next_id), 0,
GFP_NOWAIT);
@@ -249,10 +253,6 @@ int ipc_addid(struct ipc_ids *ids, struc
ids->in_use++;
- current_euid_egid(&euid, &egid);
- new->cuid = new->uid = euid;
- new->gid = new->cgid = egid;
-
if (next_id < 0) {
new->seq = ids->seq++;
if (ids->seq > IPCID_SEQ_MAX)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists