linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.1 021/202] perf stat: Get correct cpu id for print

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20151018014902.929378844@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:	Sat, 17 Oct 2015 18:56:44 -0700
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, Kan Liang <kan.liang@...el.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
	David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.1 021/202] perf stat: Get correct cpu id for print_aggr

4.1-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...el.com>

commit 601083cffb7cabdcc55b8195d732f0f7028570fa upstream.

print_aggr() fails to print per-core/per-socket statistics after commit
582ec0829b3d ("perf stat: Fix per-socket output bug for uncore events")
if events have differnt cpus. Because in print_aggr(), aggr_get_id needs
index (not cpu id) to find core/pkg id. Also, evsel cpu maps should be
used to get aggregated id.

Here is an example:

Counting events cycles,uncore_imc_0/cas_count_read/. (Uncore event has
cpumask 0,18)

  $ perf stat -e cycles,uncore_imc_0/cas_count_read/ -C0,18 --per-core sleep 2

Without this patch, it failes to get CPU 18 result.

   Performance counter stats for 'CPU(s) 0,18':

  S0-C0           1            7526851      cycles
  S0-C0           1               1.05 MiB  uncore_imc_0/cas_count_read/
  S1-C0           0      <not counted>      cycles
  S1-C0           0      <not counted> MiB  uncore_imc_0/cas_count_read/

With this patch, it can get both CPU0 and CPU18 result.

   Performance counter stats for 'CPU(s) 0,18':

  S0-C0           1            6327768      cycles
  S0-C0           1               0.47 MiB  uncore_imc_0/cas_count_read/
  S1-C0           1             330228      cycles
  S1-C0           1               0.29 MiB  uncore_imc_0/cas_count_read/

Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...el.com>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
Acked-by: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Fixes: 582ec0829b3d ("perf stat: Fix per-socket output bug for uncore events")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1435820925-51091-1-git-send-email-kan.liang@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 tools/perf/builtin-stat.c |    5 ++---
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c
+++ b/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c
@@ -1227,7 +1227,7 @@ static void abs_printout(int id, int nr,
 static void print_aggr(char *prefix)
 {
 	struct perf_evsel *counter;
-	int cpu, cpu2, s, s2, id, nr;
+	int cpu, s, s2, id, nr;
 	double uval;
 	u64 ena, run, val;
 
@@ -1240,8 +1240,7 @@ static void print_aggr(char *prefix)
 			val = ena = run = 0;
 			nr = 0;
 			for (cpu = 0; cpu < perf_evsel__nr_cpus(counter); cpu++) {
-				cpu2 = perf_evsel__cpus(counter)->map[cpu];
-				s2 = aggr_get_id(evsel_list->cpus, cpu2);
+				s2 = aggr_get_id(perf_evsel__cpus(counter), cpu);
 				if (s2 != id)
 					continue;
 				val += counter->counts->cpu[cpu].val;


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/