| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20151018014733.463229898@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2015 18:56:21 -0700
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>, Chun-Yi <jlee@...e.com>,
Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
James Bottomley <JBottomley@...n.com>,
Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@...aro.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Peter Jones <pjones@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.2 068/258] x86/efi: Fix boot crash by mapping EFI memmap entries bottom-up at runtime, instead of top-down
4.2-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>
commit a5caa209ba9c29c6421292e7879d2387a2ef39c9 upstream.
Beginning with UEFI v2.5 EFI_PROPERTIES_TABLE was introduced
that signals that the firmware PE/COFF loader supports splitting
code and data sections of PE/COFF images into separate EFI
memory map entries. This allows the kernel to map those regions
with strict memory protections, e.g. EFI_MEMORY_RO for code,
EFI_MEMORY_XP for data, etc.
Unfortunately, an unwritten requirement of this new feature is
that the regions need to be mapped with the same offsets
relative to each other as observed in the EFI memory map. If
this is not done crashes like this may occur,
BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at fffffffefe6086dd
IP: [<fffffffefe6086dd>] 0xfffffffefe6086dd
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff8104c90e>] efi_call+0x7e/0x100
[<ffffffff81602091>] ? virt_efi_set_variable+0x61/0x90
[<ffffffff8104c583>] efi_delete_dummy_variable+0x63/0x70
[<ffffffff81f4e4aa>] efi_enter_virtual_mode+0x383/0x392
[<ffffffff81f37e1b>] start_kernel+0x38a/0x417
[<ffffffff81f37495>] x86_64_start_reservations+0x2a/0x2c
[<ffffffff81f37582>] x86_64_start_kernel+0xeb/0xef
Here 0xfffffffefe6086dd refers to an address the firmware
expects to be mapped but which the OS never claimed was mapped.
The issue is that included in these regions are relative
addresses to other regions which were emitted by the firmware
toolchain before the "splitting" of sections occurred at
runtime.
Needless to say, we don't satisfy this unwritten requirement on
x86_64 and instead map the EFI memory map entries in reverse
order. The above crash is almost certainly triggerable with any
kernel newer than v3.13 because that's when we rewrote the EFI
runtime region mapping code, in commit d2f7cbe7b26a ("x86/efi:
Runtime services virtual mapping"). For kernel versions before
v3.13 things may work by pure luck depending on the
fragmentation of the kernel virtual address space at the time we
map the EFI regions.
Instead of mapping the EFI memory map entries in reverse order,
where entry N has a higher virtual address than entry N+1, map
them in the same order as they appear in the EFI memory map to
preserve this relative offset between regions.
This patch has been kept as small as possible with the intention
that it should be applied aggressively to stable and
distribution kernels. It is very much a bugfix rather than
support for a new feature, since when EFI_PROPERTIES_TABLE is
enabled we must map things as outlined above to even boot - we
have no way of asking the firmware not to split the code/data
regions.
In fact, this patch doesn't even make use of the more strict
memory protections available in UEFI v2.5. That will come later.
Suggested-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
Reported-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
Cc: Chun-Yi <jlee@...e.com>
Cc: Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: James Bottomley <JBottomley@...n.com>
Cc: Lee, Chun-Yi <jlee@...e.com>
Cc: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@...aro.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Cc: Peter Jones <pjones@...hat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1443218539-7610-2-git-send-email-matt@codeblueprint.co.uk
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c | 67 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 66 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c
+++ b/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c
@@ -705,6 +705,70 @@ out:
}
/*
+ * Iterate the EFI memory map in reverse order because the regions
+ * will be mapped top-down. The end result is the same as if we had
+ * mapped things forward, but doesn't require us to change the
+ * existing implementation of efi_map_region().
+ */
+static inline void *efi_map_next_entry_reverse(void *entry)
+{
+ /* Initial call */
+ if (!entry)
+ return memmap.map_end - memmap.desc_size;
+
+ entry -= memmap.desc_size;
+ if (entry < memmap.map)
+ return NULL;
+
+ return entry;
+}
+
+/*
+ * efi_map_next_entry - Return the next EFI memory map descriptor
+ * @entry: Previous EFI memory map descriptor
+ *
+ * This is a helper function to iterate over the EFI memory map, which
+ * we do in different orders depending on the current configuration.
+ *
+ * To begin traversing the memory map @entry must be %NULL.
+ *
+ * Returns %NULL when we reach the end of the memory map.
+ */
+static void *efi_map_next_entry(void *entry)
+{
+ if (!efi_enabled(EFI_OLD_MEMMAP) && efi_enabled(EFI_64BIT)) {
+ /*
+ * Starting in UEFI v2.5 the EFI_PROPERTIES_TABLE
+ * config table feature requires us to map all entries
+ * in the same order as they appear in the EFI memory
+ * map. That is to say, entry N must have a lower
+ * virtual address than entry N+1. This is because the
+ * firmware toolchain leaves relative references in
+ * the code/data sections, which are split and become
+ * separate EFI memory regions. Mapping things
+ * out-of-order leads to the firmware accessing
+ * unmapped addresses.
+ *
+ * Since we need to map things this way whether or not
+ * the kernel actually makes use of
+ * EFI_PROPERTIES_TABLE, let's just switch to this
+ * scheme by default for 64-bit.
+ */
+ return efi_map_next_entry_reverse(entry);
+ }
+
+ /* Initial call */
+ if (!entry)
+ return memmap.map;
+
+ entry += memmap.desc_size;
+ if (entry >= memmap.map_end)
+ return NULL;
+
+ return entry;
+}
+
+/*
* Map the efi memory ranges of the runtime services and update new_mmap with
* virtual addresses.
*/
@@ -714,7 +778,8 @@ static void * __init efi_map_regions(int
unsigned long left = 0;
efi_memory_desc_t *md;
- for (p = memmap.map; p < memmap.map_end; p += memmap.desc_size) {
+ p = NULL;
+ while ((p = efi_map_next_entry(p))) {
md = p;
if (!(md->attribute & EFI_MEMORY_RUNTIME)) {
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists