linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.2 017/258] scsi: fix scsi_error_handler vs. scsi_host_dev

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20151018014730.758451725@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:	Sat, 17 Oct 2015 18:55:30 -0700
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
	Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,
	James Bottomley <JBottomley@...n.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.2 017/258] scsi: fix scsi_error_handler vs. scsi_host_dev_release race

4.2-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>

commit 537b604c8b3aa8b96fe35f87dd085816552e294c upstream.

b9d5c6b7ef57 ("[SCSI] cleanup setting task state in
scsi_error_handler()") has introduced a race between scsi_error_handler
and scsi_host_dev_release resulting in the hang when the device goes
away because scsi_error_handler might miss a wake up:

CPU0					CPU1
scsi_error_handler			scsi_host_dev_release
  					  kthread_stop()
  kthread_should_stop()
    test_bit(KTHREAD_SHOULD_STOP)
					    set_bit(KTHREAD_SHOULD_STOP)
					    wake_up_process()
					    wait_for_completion()

  set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE)
  schedule()

The most straightforward solution seems to be to invert the ordering of
the set_current_state and kthread_should_stop.

The issue has been noticed during reboot test on a 3.0 based kernel but
the current code seems to be affected in the same way.

[jejb: additional comment added]
Reported-and-debugged-by: Mike Mayer <Mike.Meyer@...adata.com>
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <JBottomley@...n.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c |   11 ++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c
@@ -2169,8 +2169,17 @@ int scsi_error_handler(void *data)
 	 * We never actually get interrupted because kthread_run
 	 * disables signal delivery for the created thread.
 	 */
-	while (!kthread_should_stop()) {
+	while (true) {
+		/*
+		 * The sequence in kthread_stop() sets the stop flag first
+		 * then wakes the process.  To avoid missed wakeups, the task
+		 * should always be in a non running state before the stop
+		 * flag is checked
+		 */
 		set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
+		if (kthread_should_stop())
+			break;
+
 		if ((shost->host_failed == 0 && shost->host_eh_scheduled == 0) ||
 		    shost->host_failed != atomic_read(&shost->host_busy)) {
 			SCSI_LOG_ERROR_RECOVERY(1,


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/