[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5624ADF8.3090505@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 11:46:48 +0300
From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] perf/x86: Fix time_shift in perf_event_mmap_page
On 19/10/15 11:08, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com> wrote:
>
>> Commit b20112edeadf ("perf/x86: Improve accuracy of perf/sched clock")
>> allowed the time_shift value in perf_event_mmap_page to be as much
>> as 32. Unfortunately the documented algorithms for using time_shift
>> have it shifting an integer, whereas to work correctly with the value
>> 32, the type must be u64.
>>
>> Fix by limiting the shift to 31 and adjusting the multiplier accordingly.
>>
>> Also update the documentation of perf_event_mmap_page so that new code
>> based on it will be more future-proof.
>>
>> Fixes: b20112edeadf ("perf/x86: Improve accuracy of perf/sched clock")
>> Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
>
> Would be nice to point out via what symptoms the code misbehaves and how users
> notice.
In the case of perf tools, Intel PT decodes correctly but the timestamps
that are output (for example by perf script) have lost 32-bits of
granularity so they look like they are not changing at all.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists