[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5624E684.8000302@nod.at>
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 14:48:04 +0200
From: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
To: Yves-Alexis Perez <corsac@...ian.org>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
Tobias Markus <tobias@...lix.eu>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@...onical.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...uxfoundation.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
"Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@...il.com>,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
linux-man@...r.kernel.org,
Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] userns/capability: Add user namespace capability
Am 19.10.2015 um 14:36 schrieb Yves-Alexis Perez:
> On dim., 2015-10-18 at 20:41 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
>> We shouldn't need a long-term solution. Your concern is bugs. After
>> some time surely we'll feel that we have achieved a stable solution?
>
> But this is actually the whole point: we need a long term solution, because
> they will always be bug, whether in user namespaces or in others parts exposed
> by user namespaces. It's fine to fix them when we find them, but that still
> means they're exploitable even before we know about them. We still find bugs
> in code written years ago, it's quite certain there are bugs in current code.
You can replace the term "user namespace" with any other non-trivial kernel subsystem.
There will always be bugs.
Thanks,
//richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists