[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <x49bnbuop3m.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 11:27:41 -0400
From: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...onical.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ming Lin <ming.l@....samsung.com>,
Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...il.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 4/6] block: check bio_mergeable() early before merging
Ming Lei <ming.lei@...onical.com> writes:
> After bio splitting is introduced, one bio can be splitted
> and it is marked as NOMERGE because it is too fat to be merged,
> so check bio_mergeable() earlier to avoid to try to merge it
> unnecessarily.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...onical.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>
Ming, do you think we should also add a check in blk_attempt_plug_merge?
-Jeff
> ---
> block/elevator.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/elevator.c b/block/elevator.c
> index 84d6394..c3555c9 100644
> --- a/block/elevator.c
> +++ b/block/elevator.c
> @@ -420,7 +420,7 @@ int elv_merge(struct request_queue *q, struct request **req, struct bio *bio)
> * noxmerges: Only simple one-hit cache try
> * merges: All merge tries attempted
> */
> - if (blk_queue_nomerges(q))
> + if (blk_queue_nomerges(q) || !bio_mergeable(bio))
> return ELEVATOR_NO_MERGE;
>
> /*
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists