[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56251586.3010908@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 10:08:38 -0600
From: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf test: Silence tracepoint event failures
On 10/19/15 9:23 AM, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Currently, when perf test is run by a normal user, it'll fail to access
> tracepoint events. However the output is somewhat messy since it tries
> to be nice with long error messages and hints. IMHO it's not needed
> for 'perf test' by default and AFAIK the perf test uses pr_debug()
> rather than pr_err() for such messages so that one can use -v option to
> see further details on failed testcases if needed.
>
-----8<-----
>
> Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
> ---
> tools/perf/tests/openat-syscall-all-cpus.c | 2 +-
> tools/perf/tests/openat-syscall-tp-fields.c | 2 +-
> tools/perf/tests/openat-syscall.c | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
Acked-by: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists