[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151019161307.3215.72595.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 17:13:07 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, jmorris@...ei.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
dhowells@...hat.com, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
keyrings@...r.kernel.org, dvyukov@...gle.com
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] KEYS: Don't permit request_key() to construct a new
keyring
If request_key() is used to find a keyring, only do the search part - don't
do the construction part if the keyring was not found by the search. We
don't really want keyrings in the negative instantiated state since the
rejected/negative instantiation error value in the payload is unioned with
keyring metadata.
Now the kernel gives an error:
request_key("keyring", "#selinux,bdekeyring", "keyring", KEY_SPEC_USER_SESSION_KEYRING) = -1 EPERM (Operation not permitted)
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
---
security/keys/request_key.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/security/keys/request_key.c b/security/keys/request_key.c
index 486ef6fa393b..0d6253124278 100644
--- a/security/keys/request_key.c
+++ b/security/keys/request_key.c
@@ -440,6 +440,9 @@ static struct key *construct_key_and_link(struct keyring_search_context *ctx,
kenter("");
+ if (ctx->index_key.type == &key_type_keyring)
+ return ERR_PTR(-EPERM);
+
user = key_user_lookup(current_fsuid());
if (!user)
return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists