[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJ75kXZ9N5vnDHXTpoY2ZpzO9o=Crq8wo3w-Ngf=Wj9Ew87z8w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 19:24:00 +0200
From: William Dauchy <wdauchy@...il.com>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...chiereds.net>
Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Bruce Fields <bfields@...ldses.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kostya Serebryany <kcc@...gle.com>,
Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
ktsan <ktsan@...glegroups.com>,
Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs: fix data races on inode->i_flctx
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 6:53 PM, William Dauchy <wdauchy@...il.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 6:44 PM, Jeff Layton <jlayton@...chiereds.net> wrote:
>> This should be fixed by this series of four commits that are already in
>> mainline:
>> bcd7f78d078ff6197715c1ed070c92aca57ec12c..ee296d7c5709440f8abd36b5b65c6
>> b3e388538d9
>
> Am I missing something, I see three of them between
> bcd7f78d078ff6197715c1ed070c92aca57ec12c..ee296d7c5709440f8abd36b5b65c6b3e388538d9
> (and not four)
>
> ee296d7c5709440f8abd36b5b65c6b3e388538d9 locks: inline
> posix_lock_file_wait and flock_lock_file_wait
> 83bfff23e9ed19f37c4ef0bba84e75bd88e5cf21 nfs4: have do_vfs_lock take
> an inode pointer
> 29d01b22eaa18d8b46091d3c98c6001c49f78e4a locks: new helpers -
> flock_lock_inode_wait and posix_lock_inode_wait
I suppose I found the missing one
bcd7f78 locks: have flock_lock_file take an inode pointer instead of a filp
--
William
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists