[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56252A9D.1070505@arm.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 18:38:37 +0100
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To: "linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Steven Miao <realmz6@...il.com>,
"adi-buildroot-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net"
<adi-buildroot-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>
Cc: Sudeep Holla <Sudeep.Holla@....com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/17] pm: bf609: remove misuse of IRQF_NO_SUSPEND flag
On 21/09/15 16:47, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> The IRQF_NO_SUSPEND flag is used to identify the interrupts that should
> be left enabled so as to allow them to work as expected during the
> suspend-resume cycle, but doesn't guarantee that it will wake the system
> from a suspended state, enable_irq_wake is recommended to be used for
> the wakeup.
>
> This patch removes the use of IRQF_NO_SUSPEND flags replacing it with
> enable_irq_wake instead.
>
> Cc: Steven Miao <realmz6@...il.com>
Gentle Ping !
--
Regards,
Sudeep
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists