linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/5 v2] dma-mapping: add generic dma_get_page

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20151019175635.GG30179@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:	Mon, 19 Oct 2015 10:56:35 -0700
From:	Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc:	Matthew Wilcox <willy@...ux.intel.com>,
	Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
	Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@...abs.ru>,
	David Gibson <david@...son.dropbear.id.au>,
	linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5 v2] dma-mapping: add generic dma_get_page_shift API

On 15.10.2015 [15:52:19 -0700], Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> On 14.10.2015 [08:42:51 -0700], Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > Hi Nishanth,
> > 
> > sorry for the late reply.
> > 
> > > > On Power, since it's technically variable, we'd need a function. So are
> > > > you suggesting define'ing it to a function just on Power and leaving it
> > > > a constant elsewhere?
> > > > 
> > > > I noticed that sparc has a IOMMU_PAGE_SHIFT already, fwiw.
> > > 
> > > Sorry, I should have been more specific -- I'm ready to spin out a v3,
> > > with a sparc-specific function.
> > > 
> > > Are you ok with leaving it a function for now (the only caller is in
> > > NVMe obviously).
> > 
> > 
> > I guess we do indeed need a function then.  I'll take a look at your
> > patch, but as long you found a way to avoid adding too much boilerplate
> > code it should be fine.
> 
> Ok, so I've got the moved function (include/linux/dma-mapping.h
> instead of dma-mapping-common.h) ready to go, which should only
> involve changing the first patch in the series. But I'm really
> mystified by what to do for sparc, which defines IOMMU_PAGE_SHIFT and
> IO_PAGE_SHIFT in arch/sparc/kernel/iommu_common.h.
> 
> 1) Which constant reflects the value we mean for this function on
> sparc?  I assume it should be IOMMU_PAGE_SHIFT, but they are the same
> value and I want to make sure I get the semantics right.
> 
> 2) Where would I put sparc's definition of dma_get_page_shift()?
> Should it be in a asm/dma-mapping.h? Should we move some of the
> constants from arch/sparc/kernel/iommu_common.h to
> arch/sparc/include/asm/iommu_common.h and then #include that in
> asm/dma-mapping.h?
> 
> Dave M., any opinions/insights? Essentially, this helper function
> assists the NVMe driver in determining what page size it should use to
> satisfy both the device and IOMMU's requirements. Maybe I
> misunderstand the constants on sparc and PAGE_SHIFT is fine there too?

Anyone with sparc knowledge have an opinion/input?

-Nish

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/