linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3.14 00/79] 3.14.55-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20151019200950.GB12580@kroah.com>
Date:	Mon, 19 Oct 2015 13:09:50 -0700
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	Richard Kuo <rkuo@...eaurora.org>
Cc:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	shuah.kh@...sung.com, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.14 00/79] 3.14.55-stable review

On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 02:13:31PM -0500, Richard Kuo wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 08:14:47AM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 09:10:20PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > On 10/17/2015 07:04 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > >This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.14.55 release.
> > > >There are 79 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > >to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > >let me know.
> > > >
> > > >Responses should be made by Tue Oct 20 02:00:11 UTC 2015.
> > > >Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > > >
> > > 
> > > Build results:
> > > 	total: 127 pass: 125 fail: 2
> > > Failed builds:
> > > 	hexagon:defconfig
> > > 	hexagon:allnoconfig
> > > 
> > > Qemu test results:
> > > 	total: 80 pass: 80 fail: 0
> > > 
> > > The hexagon build failures are different than before, but the builds still fail.
> > > 
> > > In file included from include/linux/mm.h:19:0,
> > >                  from arch/hexagon/kernel/asm-offsets.c:28:
> > > include/linux/bit_spinlock.h: In function 'bit_spin_unlock':
> > > include/linux/bit_spinlock.h:62:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'smp_mb__before_clear_bit'
> > > In file included from arch/hexagon/kernel/asm-offsets.c:29:0:
> > > include/linux/interrupt.h: In function 'tasklet_disable_nosync':
> > > include/linux/interrupt.h:541:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'smp_mb__after_atomic_inc'
> > > include/linux/interrupt.h: In function 'tasklet_enable':
> > > include/linux/interrupt.h:553:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'smp_mb__before_atomic_dec'
> > 
> > Odd, any idea what we can do to fix it?
> > 
> > greg k-h
> 
> Apologies, the previous patch was the wrong one.

So should I delete it?  And if so, can you refresh my memory as to which
patch it was?

> It really should have been this one:
> 
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=2ab08ee9f0a4eba27c7c4ce0b6d5118e8a18554b
> 
> There was a stale barrier.h left in the directory.

I've applied this one now as well, thanks.

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/