linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] ARM: dts: Remove broken-cd from eMMC node in exynos5420-peach-pi

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-id: <56243548.1070901@samsung.com>
Date:	Mon, 19 Oct 2015 09:11:52 +0900
From:	Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
To:	Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
	Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
	Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
	Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@...labora.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] ARM: dts: Remove broken-cd from eMMC node in
 exynos5420-peach-pi

On 16.10.2015 01:51, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> The eMMC is non-removable so is marked with the non-removable DT
> property to avoid having to redetect it after a suspend/resume.
> 
> But it also has the broken-cd property which is wrong since only
> one of the DT properties for card detection should be used.
> 
> Also remove the card-detect-delay property that is not needed with
> non-removable.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>
> ---
> 
> Changes since v1:
> - None, new patch.
> 
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420-peach-pit.dts | 2 --
>  1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> 

Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>

Best regards,
Krzysztof


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/