| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1445295496-8550-1-git-send-email-andi@firstfloor.org>
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 15:58:16 -0700
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: peterz@...radead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH] x86, perf: Use INST_RETIRED.PREC_DIST for cycles:pp on Skylake
From: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Switch the cycles:pp alias from UOPS_RETITRED to INST_RETIRED.PREC_DIST.
The basic mechanism of abusing the inverse cmask to get all cycles
works the same as before.
PREC_DIST has special support for avoiding shadow effects, which
can give better results compare to UOPS_RETIRED. The drawback is
that PREC_DIST can only schedule on counter 1, but that is ok for
cycle sampling, as there is normally no need to do multiple cycle
sampling runs in parallel. It is still possible to run perf top
in parallel, as that doesn't use precise mode. Also of course
the multiplexing can still allow parallel operation.
The UOPS_RETIRED old alias is still available in raw form.
Example:
Sample a loop with 10 sqrt with old cycles:pp
0.14 │10: sqrtps %xmm1,%xmm0 <--------------
9.13 │ sqrtps %xmm1,%xmm0
11.58 │ sqrtps %xmm1,%xmm0
11.51 │ sqrtps %xmm1,%xmm0
6.27 │ sqrtps %xmm1,%xmm0
10.38 │ sqrtps %xmm1,%xmm0
12.20 │ sqrtps %xmm1,%xmm0
12.74 │ sqrtps %xmm1,%xmm0
5.40 │ sqrtps %xmm1,%xmm0
10.14 │ sqrtps %xmm1,%xmm0
10.51 │ ↑ jmp 10
We expect all 10 sqrt to get roughly the sample number of samples.
But you can see that the instruction directly after the jmp is
systematically underestimated in the result, due to sampling shadow
effects.
With the new PREC_DIST based sampling this problem is gone
and all instructions show up roughly evenly:
9.51 │10: sqrtps %xmm1,%xmm0
11.74 │ sqrtps %xmm1,%xmm0
11.84 │ sqrtps %xmm1,%xmm0
6.05 │ sqrtps %xmm1,%xmm0
10.46 │ sqrtps %xmm1,%xmm0
12.25 │ sqrtps %xmm1,%xmm0
12.18 │ sqrtps %xmm1,%xmm0
5.26 │ sqrtps %xmm1,%xmm0
10.13 │ sqrtps %xmm1,%xmm0
10.43 │ sqrtps %xmm1,%xmm0
0.16 │ ↑ jmp 10
Even with PREC_DIST there is still sampling skid and the result
is not completely even, but systematic shadow effects are
significantly reduced.
The improvements are mainly expected to make a difference
in high IPC code. With low IPC it should be similar.
The PREC_DIST event is supported back to IvyBridge, but I only tested
it on Skylake for now, so I only enabled it on Skylake.
On earlier parts there were various hardware bugs in it
(but no show stopper on IvyBridge and up I believe),
so it could be enabled there after sufficient testing.
On Sandy Bridge PREC_DIST can only be scheduled as a single
event on the PMU, which is too limiting. Before Sandy
Bridge it was not supported.
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_ds.c | 4 +++-
2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
index f8aab48..f17772a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
@@ -2487,6 +2487,31 @@ static void intel_pebs_aliases_snb(struct perf_event *event)
}
}
+static void intel_pebs_aliases_skl(struct perf_event *event)
+{
+ if ((event->hw.config & X86_RAW_EVENT_MASK) == 0x003c) {
+ /*
+ * Use an alternative encoding for CPU_CLK_UNHALTED.THREAD_P
+ * (0x003c) so that we can use it with PEBS.
+ *
+ * The regular CPU_CLK_UNHALTED.THREAD_P event (0x003c) isn't
+ * PEBS capable. However we can use INST_RETIRED.PREC_DIST
+ * (0x01c0), which is a PEBS capable event, to get the same
+ * count.
+ *
+ * The PREC_DIST event has special support to minimize sample
+ * shadowing effects. One drawback is that it can be
+ * only programmed on counter 1, but that seems like an
+ * acceptable trade off.
+ */
+ u64 alt_config = X86_CONFIG(.event=0xc0, .umask=0x01, .inv=1, .cmask=16);
+
+ alt_config |= (event->hw.config & ~X86_RAW_EVENT_MASK);
+ event->hw.config = alt_config;
+ }
+}
+
+
static unsigned long intel_pmu_free_running_flags(struct perf_event *event)
{
unsigned long flags = x86_pmu.free_running_flags;
@@ -3535,7 +3560,7 @@ __init int intel_pmu_init(void)
x86_pmu.event_constraints = intel_skl_event_constraints;
x86_pmu.pebs_constraints = intel_skl_pebs_event_constraints;
x86_pmu.extra_regs = intel_skl_extra_regs;
- x86_pmu.pebs_aliases = intel_pebs_aliases_snb;
+ x86_pmu.pebs_aliases = intel_pebs_aliases_skl;
/* all extra regs are per-cpu when HT is on */
x86_pmu.flags |= PMU_FL_HAS_RSP_1;
x86_pmu.flags |= PMU_FL_NO_HT_SHARING;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_ds.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_ds.c
index 5db1c77..acaebc7 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_ds.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_ds.c
@@ -719,8 +719,10 @@ struct event_constraint intel_hsw_pebs_event_constraints[] = {
struct event_constraint intel_skl_pebs_event_constraints[] = {
INTEL_FLAGS_UEVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x1c0, 0x2), /* INST_RETIRED.PREC_DIST */
INTEL_FLAGS_UEVENT_CONSTRAINT_DATALA_NA(0x01c2, 0xf), /* UOPS_RETIRED.ALL */
- /* UOPS_RETIRED.ALL, inv=1, cmask=16 (cycles:p). */
+ /* UOPS_RETIRED.ALL, inv=1, cmask=16 (old style cycles:p). */
INTEL_FLAGS_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x108001c2, 0xf),
+ /* INST_RETIRED.PREC_DIST, inv=1, cmask=16 (cycles:p). */
+ INTEL_FLAGS_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x108001c0, 0x2),
INTEL_PLD_CONSTRAINT(0x1cd, 0xf), /* MEM_TRANS_RETIRED.* */
INTEL_FLAGS_UEVENT_CONSTRAINT_DATALA_LD(0x11d0, 0xf), /* MEM_INST_RETIRED.STLB_MISS_LOADS */
INTEL_FLAGS_UEVENT_CONSTRAINT_DATALA_ST(0x12d0, 0xf), /* MEM_INST_RETIRED.STLB_MISS_STORES */
--
2.4.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists