linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] net: phy: dp83848: Add TI DP83848 Ethernet PHY

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5626B7F6.9010200@gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 20 Oct 2015 14:53:58 -0700
From:	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To:	"Andrew F. Davis" <afd@...com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: phy: dp83848: Add TI DP83848 Ethernet PHY

On 20/10/15 14:51, Andrew F. Davis wrote:
> On 10/20/2015 04:37 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> On 20/10/15 14:28, Andrew F. Davis wrote:
>>> Add support for the TI DP83848 Ethernet PHY device.
>>>
>>> The DP83848 is a highly reliable, feature rich, IEEE 802.3 compliant
>>> single port 10/100 Mb/s Ethernet Physical Layer Transceiver supporting
>>> the MII and RMII interfaces.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Andrew F. Davis <afd@...com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
>>
>> Just one comment below:
>>
>> [snip]
>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/Makefile b/drivers/net/phy/Makefile
>>> index 87f079c..b748224 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/phy/Makefile
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/Makefile
>>> @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_MDIO_BITBANG)    += mdio-bitbang.o
>>>   obj-$(CONFIG_MDIO_GPIO)        += mdio-gpio.o
>>>   obj-$(CONFIG_NATIONAL_PHY)    += national.o
>>>   obj-$(CONFIG_DP83640_PHY)    += dp83640.o
>>> +obj-$(CONFIG_DP83848_PHY)    += dp83848.o
>>>   obj-$(CONFIG_DP83867_PHY)    += dp83867.o
>>
>> This is a pretty small PHY driver, would it make sense to look into
>> consolidating these into e.g: dp838xx.c for instance? dp83640 is big
>> enough to be its own driver it seems.
>>
> 
> I was looking into that, but from the looks of it these drivers are small
> because only the functions that differentiate the PHYs need be defined.
> So there is very little common code between them.
> 
> I'm going to be brining up a couple more PHYs soon, so I'll keep this in
> mind
> and try to find any redundancy that can be merged when working on these.

Sounds good, thanks for giving some context on this.
-- 
Florian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/