lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1445308109-17970-6-git-send-email-ray.huang@amd.com>
Date:	Tue, 20 Oct 2015 10:28:24 +0800
From:	Huang Rui <ray.huang@....com>
To:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>, Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
	"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>,
	"Andy Lutomirski" <luto@...capital.net>,
	Andreas Herrmann <herrmann.der.user@...il.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...nel.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	"Len Brown" <lenb@...nel.org>,
	John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
	Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
CC:	<lm-sensors@...sensors.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<x86@...nel.org>,
	Andreas Herrmann <herrmann.der.user@...glemail.com>,
	Aravind Gopalakrishnan <Aravind.Gopalakrishnan@....com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
	Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
	Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@...el.com>, Tony Li <tony.li@....com>,
	Huang Rui <ray.huang@....com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 05/10] hwmon: (fam15h_power) Add compute unit accumulated power

This patch adds a member in fam15h_power_data which specifies the
compute unit accumulated power. It adds do_read_registers_on_cu to do
all the read to all MSRs and run it on one of the online cores on each
compute unit with smp_call_function_many(). This behavior can decrease
IPI numbers.

Suggested-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Signed-off-by: Huang Rui <ray.huang@....com>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/hwmon/fam15h_power.c | 68 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 67 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/fam15h_power.c b/drivers/hwmon/fam15h_power.c
index e2bfab5..88e4f3e 100644
--- a/drivers/hwmon/fam15h_power.c
+++ b/drivers/hwmon/fam15h_power.c
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
 #include <linux/module.h>
 #include <linux/pci.h>
 #include <linux/bitops.h>
+#include <linux/cpumask.h>
 #include <asm/processor.h>
 #include <asm/msr.h>
 
@@ -44,7 +45,9 @@ MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
 
 #define FAM15H_MIN_NUM_ATTRS		2
 #define FAM15H_NUM_GROUPS		2
+#define MAX_CUS				8
 
+#define MSR_F15H_CU_PWR_ACCUMULATOR	0xc001007a
 #define MSR_F15H_CU_MAX_PWR_ACCUMULATOR	0xc001007b
 
 struct fam15h_power_data {
@@ -57,6 +60,8 @@ struct fam15h_power_data {
 	struct attribute_group fam15h_power_group;
 	/* maximum accumulated power of a compute unit */
 	u64 max_cu_acc_power;
+	/* accumulated power of the compute units */
+	u64 cu_acc_power[MAX_CUS];
 };
 
 static ssize_t show_power(struct device *dev,
@@ -115,6 +120,65 @@ static ssize_t show_power_crit(struct device *dev,
 }
 static DEVICE_ATTR(power1_crit, S_IRUGO, show_power_crit, NULL);
 
+static void do_read_registers_on_cu(void *_data)
+{
+	struct fam15h_power_data *data = _data;
+	int cpu, cu, cores_per_cu;
+
+	cpu = smp_processor_id();
+
+	cores_per_cu = amd_get_cores_per_cu();
+	cu = cpu / cores_per_cu;
+
+	WARN_ON(rdmsrl_safe(MSR_F15H_CU_PWR_ACCUMULATOR,
+			    &data->cu_acc_power[cu]));
+}
+
+static int read_registers(struct fam15h_power_data *data)
+{
+	int this_cpu, ret;
+	int cu_num, cores_per_cu, cpu, cu;
+	cpumask_var_t mask;
+
+	cores_per_cu = amd_get_cores_per_cu();
+	cu_num = boot_cpu_data.x86_max_cores / cores_per_cu;
+
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(cu_num > MAX_CUS);
+
+	ret = zalloc_cpumask_var(&mask, GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!ret)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	this_cpu = get_cpu();
+
+	/*
+	 * Choose the first online core of each compute unit, and then
+	 * read their MSR value of power and ptsc in one time of IPI,
+	 * because the MSR value of cpu core represent the compute
+	 * unit's. This behavior can decrease IPI numbers between the
+	 * cores.
+	 */
+	cpu = cpumask_first(cpu_online_mask);
+	cu = cpu / cores_per_cu;
+	while (cpu < boot_cpu_data.x86_max_cores) {
+		if (cu <= cpu / cores_per_cu) {
+			cu = cpu / cores_per_cu + 1;
+			cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, mask);
+		}
+		cpu = cpumask_next(cu * cores_per_cu - 1, cpu_online_mask);
+	}
+
+	if (cpumask_test_cpu(this_cpu, mask))
+		do_read_registers_on_cu(data);
+
+	smp_call_function_many(mask, do_read_registers_on_cu, data, true);
+	put_cpu();
+
+	free_cpumask_var(mask);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static int fam15h_power_init_attrs(struct pci_dev *pdev,
 				   struct fam15h_power_data *data)
 {
@@ -253,7 +317,9 @@ static int fam15h_power_init_data(struct pci_dev *f4,
 
 	data->max_cu_acc_power = tmp;
 
-	return 0;
+	ret = read_registers(data);
+
+	return ret;
 }
 
 static int fam15h_power_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
-- 
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ