| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 00:28:44 +0200 From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, perf: Use INST_RETIRED.PREC_DIST for cycles:pp on Skylake > Typically on workstations you do not, because there's only a single > user, but on servers it might be more common. The thing I expect to be > most common is having both a CPU wide and a per task cycle counter > enabled. With multiple users they would sample only their own processes. That works fine. The only thing that needs multiplexing is overlapping sampling. perf top also works fine because it doesn't use PEBS by default. > And you having killed the flag bits for PEBS events precludes people > from using this manually, right? I think we want to exempt .inv=1 > .cmask=16 from that general rule on general utility value. I don't want to do this for every event. It has caused problems in the past. There's also no reason to use the other events. > We could maybe abuse .precise_ip = 3 for this? I implemented this now, even though it's ugly. -Andi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists