[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151020034849.GA17714@fixme-laptop.cn.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 11:48:49 +0800
From: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
To: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
Cc: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@....com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Scott J Norton <scott.norton@....com>,
Douglas Hatch <doug.hatch@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/locking/core v8 1/5] locking/qspinlock: Use
_acquire/_release versions of cmpxchg & xchg
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 08:46:02PM -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Oct 2015, Boqun Feng wrote:
>
> >>@@ -93,7 +94,7 @@ static __always_inline void queued_spin_unlock(struct qspinlock *lock)
> >> /*
> >> * smp_mb__before_atomic() in order to guarantee release semantics
> >> */
> >>- smp_mb__before_atomic_dec();
> >>+ smp_mb__before_atomic();
> >> atomic_sub(_Q_LOCKED_VAL, &lock->val);
> >
> >Just be curious, you don't use atomic_sub_release() here on purpose?
>
> atomic_sub() does not imply barriers, so there's no relaxed variants; that's
> only for _return() (and such) to the caller.
>
Ah.. my mistake ;-(
Thank you.
Regards,
Boqun
> Thanks,
> Davidlohr
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists