| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1445325735-121694-2-git-send-email-xiakaixu@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 07:22:15 +0000
From: Kaixu Xia <xiakaixu@...wei.com>
To: <ast@...mgrid.com>, <davem@...emloft.net>, <acme@...nel.org>,
<mingo@...hat.com>, <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
<masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>, <jolsa@...nel.org>,
<daniel@...earbox.net>
CC: <xiakaixu@...wei.com>, <wangnan0@...wei.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <pi3orama@....com>,
<hekuang@...wei.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH V5 1/1] bpf: control events stored in PERF_EVENT_ARRAY maps trace data output when perf sampling
This patch adds the flag soft_enable to control the trace data
output process when perf sampling. By setting this flag and
integrating with ebpf, we can control the data output process and
get the samples we are most interested in.
The bpf helper bpf_perf_event_control() can control either the perf
event on current cpu or all the perf events stored in the maps by
checking the third parameter 'flags'.
Signed-off-by: Kaixu Xia <xiakaixu@...wei.com>
---
include/linux/perf_event.h | 1 +
include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 11 ++++++++
include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h | 3 +-
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 3 +-
kernel/events/core.c | 13 +++++++++
kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
6 files changed, 91 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/perf_event.h b/include/linux/perf_event.h
index 092a0e8..bb3bf87 100644
--- a/include/linux/perf_event.h
+++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h
@@ -472,6 +472,7 @@ struct perf_event {
struct irq_work pending;
atomic_t event_limit;
+ atomic_t soft_enable;
void (*destroy)(struct perf_event *);
struct rcu_head rcu_head;
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
index 564f1f0..164d2a9 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
@@ -287,6 +287,17 @@ enum bpf_func_id {
* Return: realm if != 0
*/
BPF_FUNC_get_route_realm,
+
+ /**
+ * u64 bpf_perf_event_control(&map, index, flags) - control perf events in maps
+ * @map: pointer to PERF_EVENT_ARRAY maps
+ * @index: the key of perf event
+ * @flags: bit 0 - if true, dump event data on current cpu
+ * bit 1 - if true, control all the events in maps
+ * other bits - reserved
+ * Return: 0 on success
+ */
+ BPF_FUNC_perf_event_control,
__BPF_FUNC_MAX_ID,
};
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h b/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
index 2881145..a791b03 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
@@ -331,7 +331,8 @@ struct perf_event_attr {
comm_exec : 1, /* flag comm events that are due to an exec */
use_clockid : 1, /* use @clockid for time fields */
context_switch : 1, /* context switch data */
- __reserved_1 : 37;
+ soft_disable : 1, /* output data on samples by default */
+ __reserved_1 : 36;
union {
__u32 wakeup_events; /* wakeup every n events */
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 1d6b97b..ffec14b 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -245,6 +245,7 @@ static const struct {
} func_limit[] = {
{BPF_MAP_TYPE_PROG_ARRAY, BPF_FUNC_tail_call},
{BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERF_EVENT_ARRAY, BPF_FUNC_perf_event_read},
+ {BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERF_EVENT_ARRAY, BPF_FUNC_perf_event_control},
};
static void print_verifier_state(struct verifier_env *env)
@@ -910,7 +911,7 @@ static int check_map_func_compatibility(struct bpf_map *map, int func_id)
* don't allow any other map type to be passed into
* the special func;
*/
- if (bool_map != bool_func)
+ if (bool_func && bool_map != bool_func)
return -EINVAL;
}
diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
index b11756f..5219635 100644
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -6337,6 +6337,9 @@ static int __perf_event_overflow(struct perf_event *event,
irq_work_queue(&event->pending);
}
+ if (unlikely(!atomic_read(&event->soft_enable)))
+ return 0;
+
if (event->overflow_handler)
event->overflow_handler(event, data, regs);
else
@@ -7709,6 +7712,14 @@ static void account_event(struct perf_event *event)
account_event_cpu(event, event->cpu);
}
+static void perf_event_check_dump_flag(struct perf_event *event)
+{
+ if (event->attr.soft_disable == 1)
+ atomic_set(&event->soft_enable, 0);
+ else
+ atomic_set(&event->soft_enable, 1);
+}
+
/*
* Allocate and initialize a event structure
*/
@@ -7840,6 +7851,8 @@ perf_event_alloc(struct perf_event_attr *attr, int cpu,
}
}
+ perf_event_check_dump_flag(event);
+
return event;
err_per_task:
diff --git a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
index 0fe96c7..398ed94 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
@@ -215,6 +215,66 @@ const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_perf_event_read_proto = {
.arg2_type = ARG_ANYTHING,
};
+/* flags for PERF_EVENT_ARRAY maps */
+enum {
+ BPF_EVENT_CTL_BIT_CUR = 0,
+ BPF_EVENT_CTL_BIT_ALL = 1,
+ __NR_BPF_EVENT_CTL_BITS,
+};
+
+#define BPF_CTL_BIT_FLAG_MASK GENMASK_ULL(63, __NR_BPF_EVENT_CTL_BITS)
+#define BPF_CTL_BIT_DUMP_CUR BIT_ULL(BPF_EVENT_CTL_BIT_CUR)
+#define BPF_CTL_BIT_DUMP_ALL BIT_ULL(BPF_EVENT_CTL_BIT_ALL)
+
+static u64 bpf_perf_event_control(u64 r1, u64 index, u64 flags, u64 r4, u64 r5)
+{
+ struct bpf_map *map = (struct bpf_map *) (unsigned long) r1;
+ struct bpf_array *array = container_of(map, struct bpf_array, map);
+ struct perf_event *event;
+ int i;
+
+ if (unlikely(index >= array->map.max_entries))
+ return -E2BIG;
+
+ if (flags & BPF_CTL_BIT_FLAG_MASK)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ if (flags & BPF_CTL_BIT_DUMP_ALL) {
+ bool dump_control = flags & BPF_CTL_BIT_DUMP_CUR;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < array->map.max_entries; i++) {
+ event = (struct perf_event *)array->ptrs[i];
+ if (!event)
+ continue;
+
+ if (dump_control)
+ atomic_inc_unless_negative(&event->soft_enable);
+ else
+ atomic_dec_if_positive(&event->soft_enable);
+ }
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ event = (struct perf_event *)array->ptrs[index];
+ if (!event)
+ return -ENOENT;
+
+ if (flags & BPF_CTL_BIT_DUMP_CUR)
+ atomic_inc_unless_negative(&event->soft_enable);
+ else
+ atomic_dec_if_positive(&event->soft_enable);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_perf_event_control_proto = {
+ .func = bpf_perf_event_control,
+ .gpl_only = false,
+ .ret_type = RET_INTEGER,
+ .arg1_type = ARG_CONST_MAP_PTR,
+ .arg2_type = ARG_ANYTHING,
+ .arg3_type = ARG_ANYTHING,
+};
+
static const struct bpf_func_proto *kprobe_prog_func_proto(enum bpf_func_id func_id)
{
switch (func_id) {
@@ -242,6 +302,8 @@ static const struct bpf_func_proto *kprobe_prog_func_proto(enum bpf_func_id func
return &bpf_get_smp_processor_id_proto;
case BPF_FUNC_perf_event_read:
return &bpf_perf_event_read_proto;
+ case BPF_FUNC_perf_event_control:
+ return &bpf_perf_event_control_proto;
default:
return NULL;
}
--
1.8.3.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists