| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <tip-b14f2d357675bd7fb4e5a705ac7320a9638ecab5@git.kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 00:45:32 -0700
From: tip-bot for Ingo Molnar <tipbot@...or.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@...nel.org, acme@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mitake@....info.waseda.ac.jp, jolsa@...hat.com,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
namhyung@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com, dsahern@...il.com,
peterz@...radead.org
Subject: [tip:perf/core] perf bench mem: Change 'cycle' to 'cycles'
Commit-ID: b14f2d357675bd7fb4e5a705ac7320a9638ecab5
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/b14f2d357675bd7fb4e5a705ac7320a9638ecab5
Author: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
AuthorDate: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 10:04:23 +0200
Committer: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
CommitDate: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 16:05:01 -0300
perf bench mem: Change 'cycle' to 'cycles'
So 'perf bench mem memset/memcpy' has a CPU cycles measurement method,
but calls it 'cycle' (singular) throughout the code, which makes it
harder to read.
Rename all related functions, variables and options to a plural 'cycles'
nomenclature.
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <mitake@....info.waseda.ac.jp>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1445241870-24854-8-git-send-email-mingo@kernel.org
[ s/--cycle/--cycles/g in perf-bench man page ]
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
---
tools/perf/Documentation/perf-bench.txt | 4 +--
tools/perf/bench/mem-functions.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++-----------------
2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-bench.txt b/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-bench.txt
index 9cb60ab..17135ef 100644
--- a/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-bench.txt
+++ b/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-bench.txt
@@ -154,7 +154,7 @@ On x86-64, x86-64-unrolled, x86-64-movsq and x86-64-movsb are supported.
Repeat memcpy invocation this number of times.
-c::
---cycle::
+--cycles::
Use perf's cpu-cycles event instead of gettimeofday syscall.
*memset*::
@@ -178,7 +178,7 @@ On x86-64, x86-64-unrolled, x86-64-stosq and x86-64-stosb are supported.
Repeat memset invocation this number of times.
-c::
---cycle::
+--cycles::
Use perf's cpu-cycles event instead of gettimeofday syscall.
SUITES FOR 'numa'
diff --git a/tools/perf/bench/mem-functions.c b/tools/perf/bench/mem-functions.c
index 9c18a4b..6fe8667 100644
--- a/tools/perf/bench/mem-functions.c
+++ b/tools/perf/bench/mem-functions.c
@@ -26,8 +26,8 @@
static const char *length_str = "1MB";
static const char *routine = "all";
static int iterations = 1;
-static bool use_cycle;
-static int cycle_fd;
+static bool use_cycles;
+static int cycles_fd;
static const struct option options[] = {
OPT_STRING('l', "length", &length_str, "1MB",
@@ -37,8 +37,8 @@ static const struct option options[] = {
"Specify routine to copy, \"all\" runs all available routines"),
OPT_INTEGER('i', "iterations", &iterations,
"repeat memcpy() invocation this number of times"),
- OPT_BOOLEAN('c', "cycle", &use_cycle,
- "Use cycles event instead of gettimeofday() for measuring"),
+ OPT_BOOLEAN('c', "cycles", &use_cycles,
+ "Use a cycles event instead of gettimeofday() to measure performance"),
OPT_END()
};
@@ -78,22 +78,22 @@ static struct perf_event_attr cycle_attr = {
.config = PERF_COUNT_HW_CPU_CYCLES
};
-static void init_cycle(void)
+static void init_cycles(void)
{
- cycle_fd = sys_perf_event_open(&cycle_attr, getpid(), -1, -1, perf_event_open_cloexec_flag());
+ cycles_fd = sys_perf_event_open(&cycle_attr, getpid(), -1, -1, perf_event_open_cloexec_flag());
- if (cycle_fd < 0 && errno == ENOSYS)
+ if (cycles_fd < 0 && errno == ENOSYS)
die("No CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS=y kernel support configured?\n");
else
- BUG_ON(cycle_fd < 0);
+ BUG_ON(cycles_fd < 0);
}
-static u64 get_cycle(void)
+static u64 get_cycles(void)
{
int ret;
u64 clk;
- ret = read(cycle_fd, &clk, sizeof(u64));
+ ret = read(cycles_fd, &clk, sizeof(u64));
BUG_ON(ret != sizeof(u64));
return clk;
@@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ static double timeval2double(struct timeval *ts)
struct bench_mem_info {
const struct routine *routines;
- u64 (*do_cycle)(const struct routine *r, size_t len);
+ u64 (*do_cycles)(const struct routine *r, size_t len);
double (*do_gettimeofday)(const struct routine *r, size_t len);
const char *const *usage;
};
@@ -126,31 +126,31 @@ static void __bench_mem_routine(struct bench_mem_info *info, int r_idx, size_t l
{
const struct routine *r = &info->routines[r_idx];
double result_bps = 0.0;
- u64 result_cycle = 0;
+ u64 result_cycles = 0;
printf("Routine %s (%s)\n", r->name, r->desc);
if (bench_format == BENCH_FORMAT_DEFAULT)
printf("# Copying %s Bytes ...\n\n", length_str);
- if (use_cycle) {
- result_cycle = info->do_cycle(r, len);
+ if (use_cycles) {
+ result_cycles = info->do_cycles(r, len);
} else {
result_bps = info->do_gettimeofday(r, len);
}
switch (bench_format) {
case BENCH_FORMAT_DEFAULT:
- if (use_cycle) {
- printf(" %14lf Cycle/Byte\n", (double)result_cycle/totallen);
+ if (use_cycles) {
+ printf(" %14lf cycles/Byte\n", (double)result_cycles/totallen);
} else {
print_bps(result_bps);
}
break;
case BENCH_FORMAT_SIMPLE:
- if (use_cycle) {
- printf("%lf\n", (double)result_cycle/totallen);
+ if (use_cycles) {
+ printf("%lf\n", (double)result_cycles/totallen);
} else {
printf("%lf\n", result_bps);
}
@@ -170,8 +170,8 @@ static int bench_mem_common(int argc, const char **argv, struct bench_mem_info *
argc = parse_options(argc, argv, options, info->usage, 0);
- if (use_cycle)
- init_cycle();
+ if (use_cycles)
+ init_cycles();
len = (size_t)perf_atoll((char *)length_str);
totallen = (double)len * iterations;
@@ -220,7 +220,7 @@ static void memcpy_alloc_mem(void **dst, void **src, size_t length)
memset(*src, 0, length);
}
-static u64 do_memcpy_cycle(const struct routine *r, size_t len)
+static u64 do_memcpy_cycles(const struct routine *r, size_t len)
{
u64 cycle_start = 0ULL, cycle_end = 0ULL;
void *src = NULL, *dst = NULL;
@@ -235,10 +235,10 @@ static u64 do_memcpy_cycle(const struct routine *r, size_t len)
*/
fn(dst, src, len);
- cycle_start = get_cycle();
+ cycle_start = get_cycles();
for (i = 0; i < iterations; ++i)
fn(dst, src, len);
- cycle_end = get_cycle();
+ cycle_end = get_cycles();
free(src);
free(dst);
@@ -277,7 +277,7 @@ int bench_mem_memcpy(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix __maybe_unu
{
struct bench_mem_info info = {
.routines = memcpy_routines,
- .do_cycle = do_memcpy_cycle,
+ .do_cycles = do_memcpy_cycles,
.do_gettimeofday = do_memcpy_gettimeofday,
.usage = bench_mem_memcpy_usage,
};
@@ -292,7 +292,7 @@ static void memset_alloc_mem(void **dst, size_t length)
die("memory allocation failed - maybe length is too large?\n");
}
-static u64 do_memset_cycle(const struct routine *r, size_t len)
+static u64 do_memset_cycles(const struct routine *r, size_t len)
{
u64 cycle_start = 0ULL, cycle_end = 0ULL;
memset_t fn = r->fn.memset;
@@ -307,10 +307,10 @@ static u64 do_memset_cycle(const struct routine *r, size_t len)
*/
fn(dst, -1, len);
- cycle_start = get_cycle();
+ cycle_start = get_cycles();
for (i = 0; i < iterations; ++i)
fn(dst, i, len);
- cycle_end = get_cycle();
+ cycle_end = get_cycles();
free(dst);
return cycle_end - cycle_start;
@@ -365,7 +365,7 @@ int bench_mem_memset(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix __maybe_unu
{
struct bench_mem_info info = {
.routines = memset_routines,
- .do_cycle = do_memset_cycle,
+ .do_cycles = do_memset_cycles,
.do_gettimeofday = do_memset_gettimeofday,
.usage = bench_mem_memset_usage,
};
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists