| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1445326752-8926-6-git-send-email-haozhong.zhang@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 15:39:05 +0800
From: Haozhong Zhang <haozhong.zhang@...el.com>
To: kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@...nel.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@...mail.com>,
Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@...ux.intel.com>,
mdontu@...defender.com, Kai Huang <kai.huang@...ux.intel.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Haozhong Zhang <haozhong.zhang@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 05/12] KVM: x86: Replace call-back compute_tsc_offset() with a common function
Both VMX and SVM calculate the tsc-offset in the same way, so this
patch removes the call-back compute_tsc_offset() and replaces it with a
common function kvm_compute_tsc_offset().
Signed-off-by: Haozhong Zhang <haozhong.zhang@...el.com>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 1 -
arch/x86/kvm/svm.c | 10 ----------
arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 6 ------
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 15 ++++++++++++---
4 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index c67469b..d5e820b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -856,7 +856,6 @@ struct kvm_x86_ops {
u64 (*read_tsc_offset)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
void (*write_tsc_offset)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 offset);
- u64 (*compute_tsc_offset)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 target_tsc);
u64 (*read_l1_tsc)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 host_tsc);
void (*get_exit_info)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *info1, u64 *info2);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
index a1364927..481fdd3 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
@@ -1005,15 +1005,6 @@ static void svm_adjust_tsc_offset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, s64 adjustment, bool ho
mark_dirty(svm->vmcb, VMCB_INTERCEPTS);
}
-static u64 svm_compute_tsc_offset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 target_tsc)
-{
- u64 tsc;
-
- tsc = kvm_scale_tsc(vcpu, rdtsc());
-
- return target_tsc - tsc;
-}
-
static void init_vmcb(struct vcpu_svm *svm, bool init_event)
{
struct vmcb_control_area *control = &svm->vmcb->control;
@@ -4371,7 +4362,6 @@ static struct kvm_x86_ops svm_x86_ops = {
.read_tsc_offset = svm_read_tsc_offset,
.write_tsc_offset = svm_write_tsc_offset,
.adjust_tsc_offset = svm_adjust_tsc_offset,
- .compute_tsc_offset = svm_compute_tsc_offset,
.read_l1_tsc = svm_read_l1_tsc,
.set_tdp_cr3 = set_tdp_cr3,
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
index 7f87cf6..7896395 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
@@ -2426,11 +2426,6 @@ static void vmx_adjust_tsc_offset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, s64 adjustment, bool ho
offset + adjustment);
}
-static u64 vmx_compute_tsc_offset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 target_tsc)
-{
- return target_tsc - rdtsc();
-}
-
static bool guest_cpuid_has_vmx(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *best = kvm_find_cpuid_entry(vcpu, 1, 0);
@@ -10815,7 +10810,6 @@ static struct kvm_x86_ops vmx_x86_ops = {
.read_tsc_offset = vmx_read_tsc_offset,
.write_tsc_offset = vmx_write_tsc_offset,
.adjust_tsc_offset = vmx_adjust_tsc_offset,
- .compute_tsc_offset = vmx_compute_tsc_offset,
.read_l1_tsc = vmx_read_l1_tsc,
.set_tdp_cr3 = vmx_set_cr3,
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index db5ef73..75129bd 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -1397,6 +1397,15 @@ u64 kvm_scale_tsc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 tsc)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_scale_tsc);
+static u64 kvm_compute_tsc_offset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 target_tsc)
+{
+ u64 tsc;
+
+ tsc = kvm_scale_tsc(vcpu, rdtsc());
+
+ return target_tsc - tsc;
+}
+
void kvm_write_tsc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr)
{
struct kvm *kvm = vcpu->kvm;
@@ -1408,7 +1417,7 @@ void kvm_write_tsc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr)
u64 data = msr->data;
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&kvm->arch.tsc_write_lock, flags);
- offset = kvm_x86_ops->compute_tsc_offset(vcpu, data);
+ offset = kvm_compute_tsc_offset(vcpu, data);
ns = get_kernel_ns();
elapsed = ns - kvm->arch.last_tsc_nsec;
@@ -1465,7 +1474,7 @@ void kvm_write_tsc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr)
} else {
u64 delta = nsec_to_cycles(vcpu, elapsed);
data += delta;
- offset = kvm_x86_ops->compute_tsc_offset(vcpu, data);
+ offset = kvm_compute_tsc_offset(vcpu, data);
pr_debug("kvm: adjusted tsc offset by %llu\n", delta);
}
matched = true;
@@ -2692,7 +2701,7 @@ void kvm_arch_vcpu_load(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int cpu)
if (tsc_delta < 0)
mark_tsc_unstable("KVM discovered backwards TSC");
if (check_tsc_unstable()) {
- u64 offset = kvm_x86_ops->compute_tsc_offset(vcpu,
+ u64 offset = kvm_compute_tsc_offset(vcpu,
vcpu->arch.last_guest_tsc);
kvm_x86_ops->write_tsc_offset(vcpu, offset);
vcpu->arch.tsc_catchup = 1;
--
2.4.8
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists