lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1445326752-8926-5-git-send-email-haozhong.zhang@intel.com>
Date:	Tue, 20 Oct 2015 15:39:04 +0800
From:	Haozhong Zhang <haozhong.zhang@...el.com>
To:	kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Gleb Natapov <gleb@...nel.org>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
	Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@...mail.com>,
	Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@...ux.intel.com>,
	mdontu@...defender.com, Kai Huang <kai.huang@...ux.intel.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Haozhong Zhang <haozhong.zhang@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 04/12] KVM: x86: Replace call-back set_tsc_khz() with a common function

Both VMX and SVM propagate virtual_tsc_khz in the same way, so this
patch removes the call-back set_tsc_khz() and replaces it with a common
function.

Signed-off-by: Haozhong Zhang <haozhong.zhang@...el.com>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h |  1 -
 arch/x86/kvm/svm.c              | 36 --------------------------------
 arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c              | 17 ---------------
 arch/x86/kvm/x86.c              | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 include/linux/math64.h          | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 5 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index 1e08ad5..c67469b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -853,7 +853,6 @@ struct kvm_x86_ops {
 
 	bool (*has_wbinvd_exit)(void);
 
-	void (*set_tsc_khz)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 user_tsc_khz, bool scale);
 	u64 (*read_tsc_offset)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 	void (*write_tsc_offset)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 offset);
 
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
index d347170..a1364927 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
@@ -958,41 +958,6 @@ static void init_sys_seg(struct vmcb_seg *seg, uint32_t type)
 	seg->base = 0;
 }
 
-static void svm_set_tsc_khz(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 user_tsc_khz, bool scale)
-{
-	u64 ratio;
-	u64 khz;
-
-	/* Guest TSC same frequency as host TSC? */
-	if (!scale) {
-		vcpu->arch.tsc_scaling_ratio = TSC_RATIO_DEFAULT;
-		return;
-	}
-
-	/* TSC scaling supported? */
-	if (!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_TSCRATEMSR)) {
-		if (user_tsc_khz > tsc_khz) {
-			vcpu->arch.tsc_catchup = 1;
-			vcpu->arch.tsc_always_catchup = 1;
-		} else
-			WARN(1, "user requested TSC rate below hardware speed\n");
-		return;
-	}
-
-	khz = user_tsc_khz;
-
-	/* TSC scaling required  - calculate ratio */
-	ratio = khz << 32;
-	do_div(ratio, tsc_khz);
-
-	if (ratio == 0 || ratio & TSC_RATIO_RSVD) {
-		WARN_ONCE(1, "Invalid TSC ratio - virtual-tsc-khz=%u\n",
-				user_tsc_khz);
-		return;
-	}
-	vcpu->arch.tsc_scaling_ratio = ratio;
-}
-
 static u64 svm_read_tsc_offset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
 	struct vcpu_svm *svm = to_svm(vcpu);
@@ -4403,7 +4368,6 @@ static struct kvm_x86_ops svm_x86_ops = {
 
 	.has_wbinvd_exit = svm_has_wbinvd_exit,
 
-	.set_tsc_khz = svm_set_tsc_khz,
 	.read_tsc_offset = svm_read_tsc_offset,
 	.write_tsc_offset = svm_write_tsc_offset,
 	.adjust_tsc_offset = svm_adjust_tsc_offset,
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
index 15bff51..7f87cf6 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
@@ -2382,22 +2382,6 @@ static u64 vmx_read_l1_tsc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 host_tsc)
 	return host_tsc + tsc_offset;
 }
 
-/*
- * Engage any workarounds for mis-matched TSC rates.  Currently limited to
- * software catchup for faster rates on slower CPUs.
- */
-static void vmx_set_tsc_khz(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 user_tsc_khz, bool scale)
-{
-	if (!scale)
-		return;
-
-	if (user_tsc_khz > tsc_khz) {
-		vcpu->arch.tsc_catchup = 1;
-		vcpu->arch.tsc_always_catchup = 1;
-	} else
-		WARN(1, "user requested TSC rate below hardware speed\n");
-}
-
 static u64 vmx_read_tsc_offset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
 	return vmcs_read64(TSC_OFFSET);
@@ -10828,7 +10812,6 @@ static struct kvm_x86_ops vmx_x86_ops = {
 
 	.has_wbinvd_exit = cpu_has_vmx_wbinvd_exit,
 
-	.set_tsc_khz = vmx_set_tsc_khz,
 	.read_tsc_offset = vmx_read_tsc_offset,
 	.write_tsc_offset = vmx_write_tsc_offset,
 	.adjust_tsc_offset = vmx_adjust_tsc_offset,
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index 29c5781..db5ef73 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -1252,7 +1252,43 @@ static u32 adjust_tsc_khz(u32 khz, s32 ppm)
 	return v;
 }
 
-static void kvm_set_tsc_khz(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 this_tsc_khz)
+static int set_tsc_khz(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 user_tsc_khz, bool scale)
+{
+	u64 ratio;
+
+	/* Guest TSC same frequency as host TSC? */
+	if (!scale) {
+		vcpu->arch.tsc_scaling_ratio = kvm_default_tsc_scaling_ratio;
+		return 0;
+	}
+
+	/* TSC scaling supported? */
+	if (!kvm_has_tsc_control) {
+		if (user_tsc_khz > tsc_khz) {
+			vcpu->arch.tsc_catchup = 1;
+			vcpu->arch.tsc_always_catchup = 1;
+			return 0;
+		} else {
+			WARN(1, "user requested TSC rate below hardware speed\n");
+			return -1;
+		}
+	}
+
+	/* TSC scaling required  - calculate ratio */
+	ratio = mul_u64_u32_div(1ULL << kvm_tsc_scaling_ratio_frac_bits,
+				user_tsc_khz, tsc_khz);
+
+	if (ratio == 0 || ratio >= kvm_max_tsc_scaling_ratio) {
+		WARN_ONCE(1, "Invalid TSC scaling ratio - virtual-tsc-khz=%u\n",
+			  user_tsc_khz);
+		return -1;
+	}
+
+	vcpu->arch.tsc_scaling_ratio = ratio;
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int kvm_set_tsc_khz(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 this_tsc_khz)
 {
 	u32 thresh_lo, thresh_hi;
 	int use_scaling = 0;
@@ -1261,7 +1297,7 @@ static void kvm_set_tsc_khz(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 this_tsc_khz)
 	if (this_tsc_khz == 0) {
 		/* set tsc_scaling_ratio to a safe value */
 		vcpu->arch.tsc_scaling_ratio = kvm_default_tsc_scaling_ratio;
-		return;
+		return -1;
 	}
 
 	/* Compute a scale to convert nanoseconds in TSC cycles */
@@ -1282,7 +1318,7 @@ static void kvm_set_tsc_khz(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 this_tsc_khz)
 		pr_debug("kvm: requested TSC rate %u falls outside tolerance [%u,%u]\n", this_tsc_khz, thresh_lo, thresh_hi);
 		use_scaling = 1;
 	}
-	kvm_x86_ops->set_tsc_khz(vcpu, this_tsc_khz, use_scaling);
+	return set_tsc_khz(vcpu, this_tsc_khz, use_scaling);
 }
 
 static u64 compute_guest_tsc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, s64 kernel_ns)
@@ -3358,9 +3394,9 @@ long kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl(struct file *filp,
 		if (user_tsc_khz == 0)
 			user_tsc_khz = tsc_khz;
 
-		kvm_set_tsc_khz(vcpu, user_tsc_khz);
+		if (!kvm_set_tsc_khz(vcpu, user_tsc_khz))
+			r = 0;
 
-		r = 0;
 		goto out;
 	}
 	case KVM_GET_TSC_KHZ: {
diff --git a/include/linux/math64.h b/include/linux/math64.h
index 78aa80b..df2279c 100644
--- a/include/linux/math64.h
+++ b/include/linux/math64.h
@@ -233,4 +233,33 @@ static inline u64 mul_u64_u64_shr(u64 a, u64 mul, unsigned int shift)
 
 #endif
 
+#ifndef mul_u64_u32_div
+static inline u64 mul_u64_u32_div(u64 a, u32 mul, u32 divisor)
+{
+	union {
+		u64 ll;
+		struct {
+#ifdef __BIG_ENDIAN
+			u32 high, low;
+#else
+			u32 low, high;
+#endif
+		} l;
+	} u, rl, rh;
+
+	u.ll = a;
+	rl.ll = (u64)u.l.low * mul;
+	rh.ll = (u64)u.l.high * mul + rl.l.high;
+
+	/* Bits 32-63 of the result will be in rh.l.low.	 */
+	rl.l.high = do_div(rh.ll, divisor);
+
+	/* Bits 0-31 of the result will be in rl.l.low.	*/
+	do_div(rl.ll, divisor);
+
+	rl.l.high = rh.l.low;
+	return rl.ll;
+}
+#endif /* mul_u64_u32_div */
+
 #endif /* _LINUX_MATH64_H */
-- 
2.4.8

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ