[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5625F947.7000209@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 10:20:23 +0200
From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
To: Insu Yun <wuninsu@...il.com>, mchehab@....samsung.com,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: taesoo@...ech.edu, yeongjin.jang@...ech.edu, insu@...ech.edu,
changwoo@...ech.edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gspca: correctly checked failed allocation
Hi,
On 19-10-15 18:43, Insu Yun wrote:
> create_singlethread_workqueue can be failed in memory pressue.
> So, check return value and return -ENOMEM
>
> Signed-off-by: Insu Yun <wuninsu@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/media/usb/gspca/sq905.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/usb/gspca/sq905.c b/drivers/media/usb/gspca/sq905.c
> index a7ae0ec..b1c25d9a 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/usb/gspca/sq905.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/usb/gspca/sq905.c
> @@ -392,6 +392,8 @@ static int sd_start(struct gspca_dev *gspca_dev)
> }
> /* Start the workqueue function to do the streaming */
> dev->work_thread = create_singlethread_workqueue(MODULE_NAME);
> + if (!dev->work_thread)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> queue_work(dev->work_thread, &dev->work_struct);
>
> return 0;
If the thread creation fails we should not send the start command,
so the create_singlethread_workqueue call should be moved
up in the function, while keeping the queue_work at the end.
And if the sq905_command fails then the workqueue should
be destroyed and dev->work_thread should be set to NULL
before returning the sq905_command failure to the caller.
Regards,
Hans
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists