linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] MIPS64: signal: n64 kernel bugfix of MIPS32 o32 ABI sigaction syscall

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 20 Oct 2015 09:35:42 +0100
From:	Markos Chandras <Markos.Chandras@...tec.com>
To:	Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@...tec.com>,
	<linux-mips@...ux-mips.org>, <paul.burton@...tec.com>,
	<richard@....at>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<ralf@...ux-mips.org>, <luto@...capital.net>,
	<alex.smith@...tec.com>, <macro@...esourcery.com>,
	<mpe@...erman.id.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] MIPS64: signal: n64 kernel bugfix of MIPS32 o32 ABI
 sigaction syscall

On 10/19/2015 07:39 PM, Leonid Yegoshin wrote:
> MIPS32 o32 ABI sigaction() processing on MIPS64 n64 kernel was incorrectly
> set to processing aka rt_sigaction() variant only.
> 
> Fixed.
> --
> V3: Signature added.
> v2: Taken in account CONFIG vars interdependencies and conditional expression
>     simplified. As a result, the reverse problem fixed (introduced by v1).
>     Tested on all 3 ABIs.
> --
> 
> Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@...tec.com>
> ---
>  arch/mips/include/asm/signal.h |   12 +++++++++---
>  arch/mips/kernel/signal.c      |    2 +-
>  2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/mips/include/asm/signal.h b/arch/mips/include/asm/signal.h
> index 003e273eff4c..2292373ff11a 100644
> --- a/arch/mips/include/asm/signal.h
> +++ b/arch/mips/include/asm/signal.h
> @@ -11,11 +11,17 @@
>  
>  #include <uapi/asm/signal.h>
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MIPS32_COMPAT
> +extern struct mips_abi mips_abi_32;
>  
> -#ifdef CONFIG_TRAD_SIGNALS
> -#define sig_uses_siginfo(ka)	((ka)->sa.sa_flags & SA_SIGINFO)
> +#define sig_uses_siginfo(ka, abi)                               \
> +	((abi != &mips_abi_32) ? 1 :                            \
> +		((ka)->sa.sa_flags & SA_SIGINFO))
>  #else
> -#define sig_uses_siginfo(ka)	(1)
> +#define sig_uses_siginfo(ka, abi)                               \
> +	(config_enabled(CONFIG_64BIT) ? 1 :                     \
> +		(config_enabled(CONFIG_TRAD_SIGNALS) ?          \
> +			((ka)->sa.sa_flags & SA_SIGINFO) : 1) )
>  #endif
>  
>  #include <asm/sigcontext.h>
> diff --git a/arch/mips/kernel/signal.c b/arch/mips/kernel/signal.c
> index bf792e2839a6..5f18d0b879e0 100644
> --- a/arch/mips/kernel/signal.c
> +++ b/arch/mips/kernel/signal.c
> @@ -798,7 +798,7 @@ static void handle_signal(struct ksignal *ksig, struct pt_regs *regs)
>  		regs->regs[0] = 0;		/* Don't deal with this again.	*/
>  	}
>  
> -	if (sig_uses_siginfo(&ksig->ka))
> +	if (sig_uses_siginfo(&ksig->ka, abi))
>  		ret = abi->setup_rt_frame(vdso + abi->vdso->off_rt_sigreturn,
>  					  ksig, regs, oldset);
>  	else
> 
> 

What tree did you use for this patch? It does not seem to apply to
mainline or Ralf's upstream-sfr.

-- 
markos
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/