[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <tip-07f06cb3b5f6bd21374a48dbefdb431d71d53974@git.kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 02:34:21 -0700
From: tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra <tipbot@...or.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@...nel.org, riel@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
efault@....de, hpa@...or.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, oleg@...hat.com,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, tj@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: [tip:sched/core] sched: Start stopper early
Commit-ID: 07f06cb3b5f6bd21374a48dbefdb431d71d53974
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/07f06cb3b5f6bd21374a48dbefdb431d71d53974
Author: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
AuthorDate: Fri, 9 Oct 2015 18:00:54 +0200
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CommitDate: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 10:25:55 +0200
sched: Start stopper early
Ensure the stopper thread is active 'early', because the load balancer
pretty much assumes that its available. And when 'online && active' the
load-balancer is fully available.
Not only the numa balancing stop_two_cpus() caller relies on it, but
also the self migration stuff does, and at CPU_ONLINE time the cpu
really is 'free' to run anything.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: heiko.carstens@...ibm.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20151009160054.GA10176@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
---
kernel/cpu.c | 1 -
kernel/sched/core.c | 12 +++++++++---
2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/cpu.c b/kernel/cpu.c
index 6467521..c85df27 100644
--- a/kernel/cpu.c
+++ b/kernel/cpu.c
@@ -475,7 +475,6 @@ static int smpboot_thread_call(struct notifier_block *nfb,
case CPU_DOWN_FAILED:
case CPU_ONLINE:
- stop_machine_unpark(cpu);
smpboot_unpark_threads(cpu);
break;
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index f45a7c7..7ee8cae 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -5545,21 +5545,27 @@ static void set_cpu_rq_start_time(void)
static int sched_cpu_active(struct notifier_block *nfb,
unsigned long action, void *hcpu)
{
+ int cpu = (long)hcpu;
+
switch (action & ~CPU_TASKS_FROZEN) {
case CPU_STARTING:
set_cpu_rq_start_time();
return NOTIFY_OK;
+
case CPU_ONLINE:
/*
* At this point a starting CPU has marked itself as online via
* set_cpu_online(). But it might not yet have marked itself
* as active, which is essential from here on.
- *
- * Thus, fall-through and help the starting CPU along.
*/
+ set_cpu_active(cpu, true);
+ stop_machine_unpark(cpu);
+ return NOTIFY_OK;
+
case CPU_DOWN_FAILED:
- set_cpu_active((long)hcpu, true);
+ set_cpu_active(cpu, true);
return NOTIFY_OK;
+
default:
return NOTIFY_DONE;
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists