linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: tegra-xusb: Correct lane mux options

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <56262563.3020201@nvidia.com>
Date:	Tue, 20 Oct 2015 12:28:35 +0100
From:	Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
To:	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
CC:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
	<linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: tegra-xusb: Correct lane mux options


On 16/10/15 17:17, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 10/16/2015 03:24 AM, Jon Hunter wrote:
>> The description of the XUSB_PADCTL_USB3_PAD_MUX_0 register in the
>> Tegra124
>> documentation implies that all functions (pcie, usb3 and sata) can be
>> muxed onto to all lanes (pcie lanes 0-4 and sata lane 0). However, it has
>> been confirmed that this is not the case and the mux'ing options much
>> more
>> limited. Unfortunately, the public documentation has not been updated to
>> reflect this and so detail the actual mux'ing options here by function:
> 
> FWIW, there's better documentation of this in the Tegra210 TRM, although
> the options have been expanded on that chip, so the docs don't entirely
> apply to Tegra124.
> 
>> Function:        Lanes:
>> pcie1 x2:        pcie3, pcie4
>> pcie1 x4:        pcie1, pcie2, pcie3, pcie4
>> pcie2 x1 (option1):    pcie0
>> pcie2 x1 (option2):    pcie2
>> usb3 port 0:        pcie0
>> usb3 port 1 (option 1):    pcie1
>> usb3 port 1 (option 2):    sata0
>> sata:            sata0
> 
> I think this change needs a DT binding change to go along with it. Can
> you take a look at:
> 
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg449647.html
> [PATCH 1/2] dt: update Tegra XUSB padctl binding for Tegra210

I took a look at the above and it looks fine to me. Do you want me to
put the above info into the DT binding doc? I am not sure that we need
to update the binding itself.

Jon

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/