[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <s5hy4exemyi.wl-tiwai@suse.de>
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 14:36:21 +0200
From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
To: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>
Cc: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
Russell King <rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk>,
Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@...escale.com>,
Laurent Pinchart <renesas@...asonboard.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Jonah Petri <jpetri@...tope.com>,
Matt Campbell <mcampbell@...tope.com>,
Qiao Zhou <zhouqiao@...vell.com>,
Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>,
dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] ALSA: pcm_dmaengine: Properly synchronize DMA on shutdown
On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 13:40:00 +0200,
Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
>
> On 10/20/2015 01:17 PM, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 11:46:31 +0200,
> > Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
> >>
> >> Use the new dmaengine_synchronize() function to make sure that all complete
> >> callbacks have finished running before the runtime data, which is accessed
> >> in the completed callback, is freed.
> >>
> >> This fixes a long standing use-after-free race condition that has been
> >> observed on some systems.
> >
> > What if a substream is restarted immediately after the stop?
> >
>
> What can happen is that you get a complete callback and the associated
> snd_pcm_period_elapsed() too early, before the period has actually elapsed,
> but I don't think that this is a problem if the DMA driver properly
> implements residue reporting.
>
> This fails if we rely on period counting, but that is broken anyway and
> already prone to other race conditions.
>
> I've tested this series with xrun injection and some modifications to the
> DMA driver to always trigger the race condition when the stream is stopped.
> And I've not seen any issues after the transfer re-started. (There is a
> dead-lock condition though but that does not seem to be related to this series)
OK, then I'm fine with the changes.
I suppose this will go through dmaengine tree? If so, feel free to
take my ack:
Reviewed-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
thanks,
Takashi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists