linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] net, can, ti_hecc: add DT support for the ti,hecc controller

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <56265BC4.8080403@pengutronix.de>
Date:	Tue, 20 Oct 2015 17:20:36 +0200
From:	Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
To:	"Anton.Glukhov" <anton.a.glukhov@...il.com>, hs@...x.de
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Benoît Cousson <bcousson@...libre.com>,
	Anant Gole <anantgole@...com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-can@...r.kernel.org,
	Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
	Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>,
	linux-omap@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net, can, ti_hecc: add DT support for the ti,hecc
 controller

On 10/20/2015 05:18 PM, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> On 10/20/2015 05:09 PM, Anton.Glukhov wrote:
>>>> It's OMAP3 based arch, but HECC is implemented only in AM3505 and AM3517 SoCs.
>>>> So, I'm confused about what's "name" should I use.
>>>
>>> Which SoC was available first? Pick that.
> 
>> What do you mean available? I know only that HECC appear in AM3505 and AM3517. Nowhere else.
> 
> Available on the market. Which one was produced first or was soldered
> first to some PCB?

A colleague just looked it up, a AM3517 is a AM3505 with 3d graphics. So
pick AM3505.

Marc

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                  | Marc Kleine-Budde           |
Industrial Linux Solutions        | Phone: +49-231-2826-924     |
Vertretung West/Dortmund          | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686  | http://www.pengutronix.de   |


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (456 bytes)