[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <FC41C24E35F18A40888AACA1A36F3E418AFA524B@fmsmsx115.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 15:39:21 +0000
From: "Nelson, Shannon" <shannon.nelson@...el.com>
To: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
"Kirsher, Jeffrey T" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
"Brandeburg, Jesse" <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
"Wyborny, Carolyn" <carolyn.wyborny@...el.com>,
"Skidmore, Donald C" <donald.c.skidmore@...el.com>,
"Vick, Matthew" <matthew.vick@...el.com>,
"Ronciak, John" <john.ronciak@...el.com>,
"Williams, Mitch A" <mitch.a.williams@...el.com>
CC: "intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org" <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] intel: i40e: fix confused code
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rasmus Villemoes [mailto:linux@...musvillemoes.dk]
> Sent: Saturday, October 17, 2015 1:58 PM
> Subject: [PATCH] intel: i40e: fix confused code
>
> This code is pretty confused. The variable name 'bytes_not_copied'
> clearly indicates that the programmer knew the semantics of
> copy_{to,from}_user, but then the return value is checked for being
> negative and used as a -Exxx return value.
>
> I'm not sure this is the proper fix, but at least we get rid of the
> dead code which pretended to check for access faults.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
> ---
Acked-by: Shannon Nelson <shannon.nelson@...el.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists