[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151020163952.GI17308@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 18:39:52 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] module: Prevent recursion bug caused by module RCU check
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 12:21:03PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> +++ b/kernel/module.c
> @@ -284,11 +284,25 @@ static void module_assert_mutex(void)
> static void module_assert_mutex_or_preempt(void)
> {
> #ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP
> + static int once;
> +
> if (unlikely(!debug_locks))
> return;
>
> - WARN_ON(!rcu_read_lock_sched_held() &&
> - !lockdep_is_held(&module_mutex));
> + /*
> + * Would be nice to use WARN_ON_ONCE(), but the warning
> + * that causes a stack trace may call __module_address()
> + * which may call here, and we trigger the warning again,
> + * before the WARN_ON_ONCE() updates its flag.
> + * To prevent the recursion, we need to open code the
> + * once logic.
> + */
> + if (!once &&
> + unlikely(!rcu_read_lock_sched_held() &&
> + !lockdep_is_held(&module_mutex))) {
> + once++;
once = 1;
is more 'once' :-) Otherwise its once every 4-odd billion.
> + WARN_ON(1);
> + }
> #endif
> }
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists