[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151021231243.GH19782@codeaurora.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 16:13:10 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr>
Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] clk: add missing of_node_put
On 10/21, Julia Lawall wrote:
> for_each_matching_node_and_match performs an of_node_get on each iteration,
> so a break out of the loop requires an of_node_put.
>
> A simplified version of the semantic patch that fixes this problem is as
> follows (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr):
>
> // <smpl>
> @@
> expression e1,e2,e;
> local idexpression np;
> @@
>
> for_each_matching_node_and_match(np, e1, e2) {
> ... when != of_node_put(np)
> when != e = np
> (
> return np;
> |
> + of_node_put(np);
> ? return ...;
> )
> ...
> }
> // </smpl>
>
> Besides the problem identified by the semantic patch, this patch adds an
> of_node_get in front of saving np in a field of parent, to account for the
> fact that this value will be put on going on to the next element in the
> iteration, and then adds of_node_puts in the two loops where the parent
> pointer can be freed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr>
>
> ---
Applied to clk-next, except I collapsed the of_node_get() into
the assignment.
---8<---
diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c
index d366bfb66c58..2eae76f21d6f 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
@@ -3205,8 +3205,7 @@ void __init of_clk_init(const struct of_device_id *matches)
}
parent->clk_init_cb = match->data;
- of_node_get(np);
- parent->np = np;
+ parent->np = of_node_get(np);
list_add_tail(&parent->node, &clk_provider_list);
}
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists