[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151021180856.217e11ea@xhacker>
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 18:08:56 +0800
From: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...vell.com>
To: Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>
CC: <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
<pawel.moll@....com>, <mark.rutland@....com>,
<ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>, <galak@...eaurora.org>,
<sboyd@...eaurora.org>, <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] clk: berlin: bg2q: remove CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED flag
for sdio clk
Dear Michael,
On Wed, 21 Oct 2015 02:54:54 -0700
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com> wrote:
> Quoting Michael Turquette (2015-10-21 02:30:39)
> > Quoting Jisheng Zhang (2015-10-20 04:16:46)
> > > Since we have added the necessary two clks' properties in dts, we can
> > > remove the "sdio" clk's CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED flag now.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...vell.com>
> >
> > Applied to clk-next.
>
> So the sdhci change was dropped from v2. Do you want me to Ack these
> instead so you can send them all together?
I'll send another patch to for the sdhci change. it doesn't matter even the
sdhci change delay a merge window because no functionality changes in the
sdhci commit.
It's better we firstly take these clk clean ups because it saves power a bit
and clean up the CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED flag.
Hi Sebastian,
What do you think?
Thanks,
Jisheng
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists