[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151021102952.GJ32054@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 11:29:52 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc: "Andrew F. Davis" <afd@...com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] Documentation: tps65086: Add DT bindings for the
TPS65086 PMIC
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 09:46:33AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Oct 2015, Andrew F. Davis wrote:
> > I could change the core to be "tps65086-pmic", then call the regulator
> > driver "tps65086-regulator" if this works for you, this seems to be the
> > way new drivers name the regulator driver (max77843.c).
> Yes, this is what I was thinking of.
> ti,tps65086 is uninformative/undescriptive and tells me nothing.
It is however the normal way we write compatible strings - the class
information would normaly go in the node name (ie, i2c@...0c000 or
whatever).
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists