[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <562787E9.9030606@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 13:41:13 +0100
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@...osoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/19] ARM: dts: at91: replace gpio-key,wakeup with
wakeup-source property
On 21/10/15 12:13, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> On 21/10/15 12:01, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>> On 21 October 2015 at 12:25, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com> wrote:
[..]
>>>
>>> Yes that was my intention for splitting the patches per SoC group.
>>> Many SoC maintainers prefer that.
>>
>> Hold on! All patches that changes the DT parsing to accept the
>> "standardized wakeup-source" binding, need to be merged upstream
>> before corresponding DTS changes.
>>
>
> Agreed. Sorry for that I forgot about it as there are only few
> subsystems that needed additions. Most of the input subsystem had
> already moved to new binding, just that binding documents were left
> unchanged.
>
Having looked at it again, I think at-least this patch has no dependency
on those driver/sub-system changes. Only patch 11, 13 and 17 has
dependency. All the other DTS changes are related to input subsystem
where all the required changes are already there.
--
Regards,
Sudeep
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists