[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20151021.061737.817854527348057019.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 06:17:37 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: sowmini.varadhan@...cle.com
Cc: steffen.klassert@...unet.com, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, dhowells@...hat.com,
zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, David.Woodhouse@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] xfrm: Fix unaligned access in
xfrm_notify_sa() for DELSA
From: Sowmini Varadhan <sowmini.varadhan@...cle.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 06:54:42 -0400
> On (10/21/15 08:57), Steffen Klassert wrote:
>> > --- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c
>> > +++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c
>> > @@ -2659,7 +2659,7 @@ static int xfrm_notify_sa(struct xfrm_state *x, const struct km_event *c)
>> > if (attr == NULL)
>> > goto out_free_skb;
>> >
>> > - p = nla_data(attr);
>> > + p = PTR_ALIGN(nla_data(attr), __alignof__(*p));
>>
>> Hm, this breaks userspace notifications on 64-bit systems.
>> Userspace expects this to be aligned to 4, with your patch
>> it is aligned to 8 on 64-bit.
>>
>> Without your patch I get the correct notification when deleting a SA:
>>
>
> But __alignof__(*p) is 8 on sparc, and without the patch I get
> all types of unaligned access. So what do you suggest as the fix?
The accesses have to be done using something like get_unaligned() and
put_unaligned().
Sorry, but the protocol is set in stone and this is unfortunately how
it is.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists