| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20151021134348.GI10639@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 10:43:48 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: "Wangnan (F)" <wangnan0@...wei.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
Chandler Carruth <chandlerc@...il.com>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
pi3orama <pi3orama@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/16] perf callchain: Switch default to
'graph,0.5,caller'
Em Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 10:48:16AM +0200, Ingo Molnar escreveu:
>
> * Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> > I was bitten by the --children thing and took some time to get used to it, so I
> > can relate to that...
> >
> > I think we should revert this change in callchain default, enough complaints...
> > Ingo, since you suggested that change, what are your thoughts?
>
> Btw., one side note, I noticed that the call-graph options to 'perf top' do not
> match that of perf report. I tried for a couple of minutes to figure out why this
> doesn't work:
>
> perf top -g graph,0.5,caller
>
> ... only to notice that it's perf report options.
Right, 'perf top' needs 'record' and 'report' knobs, so, for -g, it uses
the 'record' semantics where its parameters specify how to _collect_ the
callchains, not how to _present_ them, i.e.:
perf report:
-g, --call-graph <output_type,min_percent[,print_limit],call_order[,branch]>
Display callchains using output_type (graph, flat, fractal or
none) , min percent threshold, optional print limit, callchain
order, key (function or address), add branches.
Default: graph,0.5,caller
perf record:
-g enables call-graph recording
--call-graph <mode[,dump_size]>
setup and enables call-graph (stack chain/backtrace)
recording: fp dwarf lbr
perf top:
-g enables call-graph recording
--call-graph <mode[,dump_size]>
setup and enables call-graph (stack chain/backtrace)
recording: fp dwarf lbr
Possibly we could make it smart and accept both cases, interpreting
'report' like parameters if starting with one of (graph, flat, fractal
or none) having as a separator one of (fp, dwarf or lbr).
This way one could specify both how to collect and how to present
callchains in one --call-graph call.
> A couple of thoughts about defaults:
>
> 1)
>
> I think 'perf top' and 'perf report' should provide the very same output by
> default. The two tools are unified, and we should think of 'perf top' more of a
> rolling, continuously updated perf report, with some dynamic runtime features that
> go beyond a simple perf report. Making them diverge only creates confusion.
That is the idea, now with 'f' (Enable/Disable events) in the TUI it is
one step closer to that, i.e. it moves to/from top/dynamic to/from
report/static,we need more code to ask it to start collecting into a
perf.data so that it gets 'record', but the general idea is to have it
all integrated.
> 2) min-percentage
>
> I suspect the '0.5%' part of the default is not contested by anyone?
>
> 3) 'graph' vs. 'fractal'
>
> The 'graph' part of the default: I think 'graph' (absolute percentages) is more
> intuitive in general than 'fractal' (relative percentages), especially when
> drilling down deep into more complex call graphs.
Here I'm more worried about polishing the invalid entries in callchains
so that we can have sane caller based output.
With some work we could go to/from caller/callee without a huge impact,
i.e. without the need to reprocess everything.
> For example, if you look at this output:
>
> | | | |--41.61%-- local_apic_timer_interrupt
> | | | | |
> | | | | --100.00%-- hrtimer_interrupt
> | | | | __run_hrtimer
> | | | | |
> | | | | |--72.98%-- hrtimer_wakeup
> | | | | | wake_up_process
> | | | | | |
> | | | | | --100.00%-- try_to_wake_up
> | | | | | ttwu_do_activate.constprop.93
> | | | | | activate_task
> | | | | | enqueue_task
> | | | | | enqueue_task_fair
> | | | | | enqueue_entity
> | | | | |
> | | | | --27.02%-- ehci_hrtimer_func
>
> Would you have guessed that its relevance in reality is:
>
> | | | |
> | | | |--0.11%-- local_apic_timer_interrupt
> | | | | |
> | | | | --0.10%-- hrtimer_interrupt
> | | | | __run_hrtimer
> | | | | |
> | | | | |--0.07%-- hrtimer_wakeup
> | | | | | wake_up_process
> | | | | | |
> | | | | | --0.01%-- try_to_wake_up
> | | | | | ttwu_do_activate.constprop.93
> | | | | | activate_task
> | | | | | enqueue_task
> | | | | | enqueue_task_fair
> | | | | | enqueue_entity
> | | | | |
> | | | | --0.03%-- ehci_hrtimer_func
> | | | |
>
> ?
>
> I think the 'big picture' should always be apparent, even when looking at a small
> detail. Also, it's not _that_ hard to see the relative weight of each entry even
> if they are small numbers.
>
> Fractal output can be useful if you are trying to drill down really, really deep
> and only concentrate on that aspect - but that kind of workflow is probably best
> served via a search option in any case:
>
> perf report --call-graph fractal,0.5,caller --stdio --symbol-filter local_apic_timer_interrupt
>
> In which case fractal output is the more intuitive one I suspect:
>
> # To display the perf.data header info, please use --header/--header-only options.
> #
> #
> # Total Lost Samples: 0
> #
> # Samples: 1K of event 'cycles:pp'
> # Event count (approx.): 1155803425
> #
> # Children Self Command Shared Object Symbol
> # ........ ........ ....... ................. ..............................
> #
> 0.11% 0.01% swapper [kernel.kallsyms] [k] local_apic_timer_interrupt
> |
> |--89.19%-- local_apic_timer_interrupt
> | hrtimer_interrupt
> | __run_hrtimer
> | |
> | |--72.98%-- hrtimer_wakeup
> | | wake_up_process
> | | |
> | | --100.00%-- try_to_wake_up
> | | ttwu_do_activate.constprop.93
> | | activate_task
> | | enqueue_task
> | | enqueue_task_fair
> | | enqueue_entity
> | |
> | --27.02%-- ehci_hrtimer_func
> |
> --10.81%-- start_secondary
> cpu_startup_entry
> cpuidle_enter
> apic_timer_interrupt
> smp_apic_timer_interrupt
> local_apic_timer_interrupt
>
>
>
> #
> # (For a higher level overview, try: perf report --sort comm,dso)
> #
>
> Btw., I noticed an oddity, why doesn't "-S local_apic_timer_interrupt" produce any
> output? It was the first option I tried, and it only gave me:
I'll check that
> triton:~/tip> perf report --call-graph fractal,0.5,caller --stdio -S local_apic_timer_interrupt
> [nv] with build id 744b5b4279152a54e61208989daf5d3d6b375aa3 not found, continuing without symbols
> Failed to open /tmp/perf-6650.map, continuing without symbols
> # To display the perf.data header info, please use --header/--header-only options.
> #
> # symbol: local_apic_timer_interrupt
> #
> # Total Lost Samples: 0
> #
> # Samples: 1K of event 'cycles:pp'
> # Event count (approx.): 1155803425
> #
> # Children Self Command Shared Object
> # ........ ........ ....... .............
> #
>
>
> #
> # (For a higher level overview, try: perf report --sort comm,dso)
> #
>
> some symbols could not be found - but the output is pretty confusing and
> misleading in outputing just empty headers, plus it doesn't explain why it does
> so.
Needs fixing, will check
> 4) 'caller' vs. 'callee'.
>
> If I change 'caller' to 'callee' in the above example, I get this output:
>
> triton:~/tip> perf report --call-graph fractal,0.5,callee --stdio --symbol-filter local_apic_timer_interrupt
> [nv] with build id 744b5b4279152a54e61208989daf5d3d6b375aa3 not found, continuing without symbols
> Failed to open /tmp/perf-6650.map, continuing without symbols
> # To display the perf.data header info, please use --header/--header-only options.
> #
> #
> # Total Lost Samples: 0
> #
> # Samples: 1K of event 'cycles:pp'
> # Event count (approx.): 1155803425
> #
> # Children Self Command Shared Object Symbol
> # ........ ........ ....... ................. ..............................
> #
> 0.11% 0.01% swapper [kernel.kallsyms] [k] local_apic_timer_interrupt
> |
> ---local_apic_timer_interrupt
> smp_apic_timer_interrupt
> apic_timer_interrupt
> cpuidle_enter
> cpu_startup_entry
> start_secondary
>
>
>
> #
> # (For a higher level overview, try: perf report --sort comm,dso)
> #
>
> That does not look very helpful, does it?
>
> Now I tried to test caller vs. callee in perf top - but couldn't find a command
> line option to do it - is there any?
>
> 5) --no-children
>
> I agree that 'perf top -g --no-children' looks more intuitive than 'perf top -g'.
So, what do you propose, to switch back the default to --no-children,
for both tools, top and report? Now that I am getting used to it... ;-)
- Arnaldo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists