[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151021134951.GH3604@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 15:49:51 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: "Wangnan (F)" <wangnan0@...wei.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>,
xiakaixu <xiakaixu@...wei.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
acme@...nel.org, mingo@...hat.com, masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com,
jolsa@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, pi3orama@....com, hekuang@...wei.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 1/1] bpf: control events stored in PERF_EVENT_ARRAY
maps trace data output when perf sampling
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 09:42:12PM +0800, Wangnan (F) wrote:
> How can an eBPF program access a !local event:
>
> when creating perf event array we don't care which perf event
> is for which CPU, so perf program can access any perf event in
> that array.
So what is stopping the eBPF thing from calling perf_event_read_local()
on a !local event and triggering a kernel splat?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists