lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMpxmJWX_20=X_zDqwz0H=_4s+bPVTi0qf8CT6y-4ABeCGfVRQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 21 Oct 2015 16:15:49 +0200
From:	Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
To:	Peter Korsgaard <peter@...sgaard.com>
Cc:	Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
	linux-i2c <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 0/9] eeprom: at24: at24cs series serial number read

2015-10-21 13:03 GMT+02:00 Peter Korsgaard <peter@...sgaard.com>:
>>>>>> "Bartosz" == Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com> writes:
>
>  > Chips from the at24cs EEPROM series have an additional read-only memory area
>  > containing a factory pre-programmed serial number. In order to access it, a
>  > dummy write must be executed before reading the serial number bytes.
>
>  > This series adds support for reading the serial number through a sysfs
>  > attribute.
>
>  > While we're at it: some of the patches contain readability tweaks and code
>  > organization fixes.
>
>  > Tested with at24cs64 and at24cs02 chips (for both 16 and 8 bit address
>  > pointers).
>
> As the serial number is available on a separate i2c address, wouldn't
> it be simpler to handle these as special (read only) device variants and
> instantiate E.G. a 24c64 (for the normal data) and a 24cs64 (for the
> serial)?
>

Hi Peter,

I wanted to respond that this way we would not be protected from
concurrent accesses, but then I saw I didn't actually include any
locks in the serial read function - my bad. It needs to be fixed as
both memory blocks share the same address pointer.

I'll resend the series.

Best regards,
Bartosz Golaszewski
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ