[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1510210920200.5611@east.gentwo.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 09:22:40 -0500 (CDT)
From: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
To: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, mhocko@...nel.org,
rientjes@...gle.com, oleg@...hat.com, kwalker@...hat.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, hannes@...xchg.org,
vdavydov@...allels.com, skozina@...hat.com, mgorman@...e.de,
riel@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm,vmscan: Use accurate values for zone_reclaimable()
checks
On Wed, 21 Oct 2015, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> However, if a workqueue which is processed before vmstat_update
> workqueue is processed got stuck inside memory allocation request,
> values in vm_stat_diff[] cannot be merged into vm_stat[]. As a result,
> zone_reclaimable() continues using outdated vm_stat[] values and the
> task which is doing direct reclaim path thinks that there are reclaimable
> pages and therefore continues looping. The consequence is a silent
> livelock (hang up without any kernel messages) because the OOM killer
> will not be invoked.
The diffs will be merged if they reach a certain threshold regardless. You
can decrease that threshhold. See calculate_pressure_threshhold().
Why is the merging not occurring if a process gets stuck? Workrequests are
not blocked by a process being stuck doing memory allocation or reclaim.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists