| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <5626F81B.9010300@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 10:27:39 +0800
From: "Wangnan (F)" <wangnan0@...wei.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
CC: <ast@...mgrid.com>, <brendan.d.gregg@...il.com>,
<a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>, <daniel@...earbox.net>,
<dsahern@...il.com>, <hekuang@...wei.com>, <jolsa@...nel.org>,
<lizefan@...wei.com>, <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
<namhyung@...nel.org>, <paulus@...ba.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <pi3orama@....com>,
<xiakaixu@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/31] perf record, bpf: Create probe points for BPF programs
On 2015/10/21 3:12, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 12:41:15PM +0000, Wang Nan escreveu:
>> This patch introduces bpf__{un,}probe() functions to enable callers to
>> create kprobe points based on section names a BPF program. It parses
>> the section names in the program and creates corresponding 'struct
>> perf_probe_event' structures. The parse_perf_probe_command() function is
>> used to do the main parsing work. The resuling 'struct perf_probe_event'
>> is stored into program private data for further using.
>>
>> By utilizing the new probing API, this patch creates probe points during
>> event parsing.
>>
>> To ensure probe points be removed correctly, register an atexit hook
>> so even perf quit through exit() bpf__clear() is still called, so probing
>> points are cleared. Note that bpf_clear() should be registered before
>> bpf__probe() is called, so failure of bpf__probe() can still trigger
>> bpf__clear() to remove probe points which are already probed.
>>
>> strerror style error reporting scaffold is created by this patch.
>> bpf__strerror_probe() is the first error reporting function in bpf-loader.c.
> So, this one, for a non-root user gives me:
>
> [acme@...icio linux]$ perf record --event /tmp/foo.o sleep 1
> event syntax error: '/tmp/foo.o'
> \___ Invalid argument
>
> (add -v to see detail)
> Run 'perf list' for a list of valid events
>
> Usage: perf record [<options>] [<command>]
> or: perf record [<options>] -- <command> [<options>]
>
> -e, --event <event> event selector. use 'perf list' to list available events
> [acme@...icio linux]$
It should be:
# perf record -e ./test_config_map.o ls
Failed to init vmlinux path.
event syntax error: './test_config_map.o'
\___ You need to be root, and
/proc/sys/kernel/kptr_restrict should be 0
(add -v to see detail)
Run 'perf list' for a list of valid events
usage: perf record [<options>] [<command>]
or: perf record [<options>] -- <command> [<options>]
-e, --event <event> event selector. use 'perf list' to list
available events
So this is another problem related to probing. I'll have a look at your lot.
Thank you.
> --------------------
>
> I.e. no libbpf error (good!) but then, just an -EINVAL as the "event syntax
> error", which clearly isn't a syntax error, we need to tell the user that he or she
> needs special perfmissions for using sys_bpf() :-)
>
> As root:
>
> [root@...icio ~]# perf record --event /tmp/foo.o sleep
> event syntax error: '/tmp/foo.o'
> \___ Invalid argument
>
> (add -v to see detail)
> Run 'perf list' for a list of valid events
>
> Usage: perf record [<options>] [<command>]
> or: perf record [<options>] -- <command> [<options>]
>
> -e, --event <event> event selector. use 'perf list' to list available events
> [root@...icio ~]# ls -la /tmp/foo.o
> -rw-rw-r--. 1 acme acme 824 Oct 20 12:35 /tmp/foo.o
> [root@...icio ~]# file /tmp/foo.o
> /tmp/foo.o: ELF 64-bit LSB relocatable, no machine, version 1 (SYSV), not stripped
>
>
> Humm, its something else, this is an ancient kernel, 4.2.0, probably without
> eBPF support? Nope, its there:
>
> [root@...icio ~]# grep -i sys_bpf /proc/kallsyms
> ffffffff811829d0 T SyS_bpf
> ffffffff811829d0 T sys_bpf
> [root@...icio ~]#
>
> Its something else, we need to improve this error reporting:
>
> [root@...icio ~]# perf record -v --event /tmp/foo.o sleep 1
> libbpf: loading /tmp/foo.o
> libbpf: section .strtab, size 60, link 0, flags 0, type=3
> libbpf: section .text, size 0, link 0, flags 6, type=1
> libbpf: section .data, size 0, link 0, flags 3, type=1
> libbpf: section .bss, size 0, link 0, flags 3, type=8
> libbpf: section do_fork, size 16, link 0, flags 6, type=1
> libbpf: found program do_fork
> libbpf: section license, size 4, link 0, flags 3, type=1
> libbpf: license of /tmp/foo.o is GPL
> libbpf: section version, size 4, link 0, flags 3, type=1
> libbpf: kernel version of /tmp/foo.o is 40100
> libbpf: section .symtab, size 96, link 1, flags 0, type=2
> bpf: config program 'do_fork'
> symbol:do_fork file:(null) line:0 offset:0 return:0 lazy:(null)
> bpf: 'do_fork': event name is missing
> event syntax error: '/tmp/foo.o'
> \___ Invalid argument
>
> (add -v to see detail)
> Run 'perf list' for a list of valid events
>
> Usage: perf record [<options>] [<command>]
> or: perf record [<options>] -- <command> [<options>]
>
> -e, --event <event> event selector. use 'perf list' to list available events
> [root@...icio ~]#
>
> [root@...icio ~]# grep do_fork /proc/kallsyms
> ffffffff81099ab0 T _do_fork
> ffffffff81ccc800 d do_fork_test
> [root@...icio ~]#
>
> $ echo '__attribute__((section("_do_fork"), used)) int fork(void *ctx) {return 0;} char _license[] __attribute__((section("license"), used)) = "GPL";int _version __attribute__((section("version"), used)) = 0x40100;' | clang -D__KERNEL__ $CLANG_OPTIONS $KERNEL_INC_OPTIONS -Wno-unused-value -Wno-pointer-sign -working-directory $WORKING_DIR -c - -target bpf -O2 -o /tmp/foo.o
>
> [root@...icio ~]# perf record -v --event /tmp/foo.o sleep 1
> libbpf: loading /tmp/foo.o
> libbpf: section .strtab, size 61, link 0, flags 0, type=3
> libbpf: section .text, size 0, link 0, flags 6, type=1
> libbpf: section .data, size 0, link 0, flags 3, type=1
> libbpf: section .bss, size 0, link 0, flags 3, type=8
> libbpf: section _do_fork, size 16, link 0, flags 6, type=1
> libbpf: found program _do_fork
> libbpf: section license, size 4, link 0, flags 3, type=1
> libbpf: license of /tmp/foo.o is GPL
> libbpf: section version, size 4, link 0, flags 3, type=1
> libbpf: kernel version of /tmp/foo.o is 40100
> libbpf: section .symtab, size 96, link 1, flags 0, type=2
> bpf: config program '_do_fork'
> symbol:_do_fork file:(null) line:0 offset:0 return:0 lazy:(null)
> bpf: '_do_fork': event name is missing
> event syntax error: '/tmp/foo.o'
> \___ Invalid argument
>
> (add -v to see detail)
> Run 'perf list' for a list of valid events
>
> Usage: perf record [<options>] [<command>]
> or: perf record [<options>] -- <command> [<options>]
>
> -e, --event <event> event selector. use 'perf list' to list available events
> [root@...icio ~]#
>
> So it still doesn't work, doesn't look like it is trying to find a vmlinux,
> will look at another patch IIRC is in this patchkit allowing us to tell
> 'perf record' where to find it... But it can as well use kallsyms...
>
> - Arnaldo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists