[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151021145505.GE8805@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 16:55:05 +0200
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, rientjes@...gle.com,
oleg@...hat.com, kwalker@...hat.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
hannes@...xchg.org, vdavydov@...allels.com, skozina@...hat.com,
mgorman@...e.de, riel@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm,vmscan: Use accurate values for zone_reclaimable()
checks
On Wed 21-10-15 09:49:07, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Oct 2015, Michal Hocko wrote:
>
> > Because all the WQ workers are stuck somewhere, maybe in the memory
> > allocation which cannot make any progress and the vmstat update work is
> > queued behind them.
> >
> > At least this is my current understanding.
>
> Eww. Maybe need a queue that does not do such evil things as memory
> allocation?
I am not sure how to achieve that. Requiring non-sleeping worker would
work out but do we have enough users to add such an API?
I would rather see vmstat using dedicated kernel thread(s) for this this
purpose. We have discussed that in the past but it hasn't led anywhere.
Anyway the workaround for this issue seems to be pretty trivial and
shouldn't affect users out of direct reclaim much so it sounds good
enough to me. Longterm we should really get rid of scan_reclaimable from
the direct reclaim altogether.
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists