[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1445439679.3126.5.camel@hasee>
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 08:01:19 -0700
From: Ming Lin <mlin@...nel.org>
To: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...il.com>,
Dongsu Park <dpark@...teo.net>,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Ming Lin <ming.l@....samsung.com>,
linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 05/11] block: remove split code in
blkdev_issue_{discard,write_same}
On Wed, 2015-10-21 at 09:39 -0400, Jeff Moyer wrote:
> Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> writes:
>
> > Jens, Ming:
> >
> > are you fine with the one liner change to get back to the old I/O
> > pattern? While it looks like the cards fault I'd like to avoid this
> > annoying regression.
>
> I'm not Jens or Ming, but your patch looks fine to me, though you'll
> want to remove the MAX_BIO_SECTORS definition since it's now unused.
> It's not clear to me why the limit was lowered in the first place.
UINT_MAX >> 9 is not power of 2 and it causes dm-thinp discard fails.
At the lengthy discussion:
[PATCH v5 01/11] block: make generic_make_request handle arbitrarily sized bios
We agreed to cap discard to 2G as an interim solution for 4.3 until the
dm-thinp discard code is rewritten.
Hi Mike,
Will the dm-thinp discard rewritten ready for 4.4?
Thanks,
Ming
>
> You can add my Reviewed-by: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com> if you resend
> the patch.
>
> -Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists