[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5627CABD.7030609@plumgrid.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 10:26:21 -0700
From: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>,
He Kuang <hekuang@...wei.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/3] bpf: introduce bpf_perf_event_output()
helper
On 10/21/15 5:06 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> PERF_COUNT_SW_DUMMY = 9,
>> >+ PERF_COUNT_SW_BPF_OUTPUT = 10,
>> >
>> > PERF_COUNT_SW_MAX, /* non-ABI */
>> > };
> Do you really need the new type? Can't you use DUMMY for this?
It works fine with dummy, but user space code looked odd when
it perf_event_open-s dummy events and starts reading them.
So I thought either to add alias:
PERF_COUNT_SW_BPF_OUTPUT = PERF_COUNT_SW_DUMMY
or
add new number like I did above.
New number is cheap and I saw that dummy used for probing,
so went with new number to disambiguate.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists