lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 15:24:41 -0400 From: Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com> To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> Cc: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org> Subject: Re: console vs earlycon ? On 10/21/2015 03:00 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Wednesday 21 October 2015 11:32:15 Peter Hurley wrote: >> On 10/21/2015 10:13 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >>> On Wednesday 21 October 2015 09:53:47 Peter Hurley wrote: >>>> I'm assuming the issue with trying to get console_init() working >>>> is because the dummy color console causes the earlycon to be disabled? >>> >>> I don't think so. >>> >>> My line of thinking was more about usability: earlycon requires that >>> you edit the kernel command line at the moment, while console_init() >>> doesn't require any user interaction and just uses the stdout-path. >>> >>> I guess we could enable earlycon using a Kconfig symbol if we want >>> to, or make it a per-architecture decision whether it's enabled even >>> in the absence of the command line flag. >> >> Ah, I see. You want to start the stdout-path console at console_init() >> time. > > Yes, I see this as a tradeoff: we want the console to be as early as > possible in order to report boot-time errors to the user, but not so early > to require hacks that can cause problems themselves. earlycon has to > do some scary stuff and is relatively recent, while the hacks > necessary for console_init() are much older and better tested. I assume you mean the hacks necessary to get _earlycon_ working at console_init() time, because the hacks necessary to get non-8250 serial consoles working at console_init() would be extensive and brand new. Regards, Peter Hurley -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists