lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <56282E2E.4010207@matheina.com> Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 19:30:38 -0500 From: Scott Matheina <scott@...heina.com> To: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@...hat.com>, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> Cc: Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>, linux-audit@...hat.com, trivial@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Fixed Trivial Warnings in file: Deleted Spaces prior to tabs, and added lines. modified: kernel/auditfilter.c On 10/21/2015 10:33 AM, Richard Guy Briggs wrote: > On 15/10/21, Joe Perches wrote: >> On Mon, 2015-10-19 at 12:10 -0400, Richard Guy Briggs wrote: >>> On 15/10/18, Scott Matheina wrote: >>>> On 10/14/2015 04:54 PM, Paul Moore wrote: >>>>> On Saturday, October 10, 2015 08:57:55 PM Scott Matheina wrote: >> [] >>>>>> diff --git a/kernel/auditfilter.c b/kernel/auditfilter.c >> [] >>>>>> @@ -109,6 +109,7 @@ void audit_free_rule_rcu(struct rcu_head *head) >>>>>> { >>>>>> struct audit_entry *e = container_of(head, struct audit_entry, rcu); >>>>>> audit_free_rule(e); >>>>>> + >>>>>> } >>>>> Why? >>>> I was following the error messages in checkpatch.pl, but the warning >>>> went away after adding this line. No problem with the code. >>> That sounds like a bug in checkpatch.pl, since that blank line should be >>> tween the declaration and the function call. >> checkpatch message asks for a blank line after the >> "struct audit_entry *e = ..." declaration. > Well then maybe it is a bug in his interpretation of the output of > checkpatch.pl? Scott, did you re-run checkpatch.pl after adding those > spaces? Did it pass? The error did go away. >>>>>> while (*list != ~0U) { >>>>>> + >>>>>> unsigned n = *list++; >>>>>> if (n >= AUDIT_BITMASK_SIZE * 32 - AUDIT_SYSCALL_CLASSES) { >>>>>> kfree(p); >>>>> Why? >>>> This is the same as above. Just going through the checkpatch.pl >>>> script, and looking for warnings to fix. >>> Again, another manifestation of that bug? That blank line should be >>> after the declaration and before the if statement. >> [] >>> Well, I agree, you have to start somewhere... Too bad you hit a bug in >>> checkpatch.pl! >> Here too, not a bug in checkpatch. >> >> checkpatch output asks for a blank line after the >> "unsigned n" declaration, not before. > - RGB > > -- > Richard Guy Briggs <rbriggs@...hat.com> > Senior Software Engineer, Kernel Security, AMER ENG Base Operating Systems, Red Hat > Remote, Ottawa, Canada > Voice: +1.647.777.2635, Internal: (81) 32635, Alt: +1.613.693.0684x3545 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists