lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1800338.r1NE3r6BDS@vostro.rjw.lan> Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 03:02:14 +0200 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net> To: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@...labora.com> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>, Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>, Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 03/22] of/platform: Point to struct device from device node On Monday, September 21, 2015 04:02:43 PM Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > When adding platform and AMBA devices, set the device node's device > member to point to it. > > This speeds lookups considerably and is safe because we only create one > of these devices for any given device node. > > Signed-off-by: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@...labora.com> > --- > > Changes in v5: > - Set the pointer to struct device also for AMBA devices > - Unset the pointer to struct device when the platform device is about > to be unregistered > - Increase the reference count of the device before returning from > of_find_device_by_node() > > drivers/of/platform.c | 19 ++++++++++--------- > include/linux/of.h | 1 + > 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/of/platform.c b/drivers/of/platform.c > index 1001efaedcb8..408d89f1d124 100644 > --- a/drivers/of/platform.c > +++ b/drivers/of/platform.c > @@ -32,11 +32,6 @@ const struct of_device_id of_default_bus_match_table[] = { > {} /* Empty terminated list */ > }; > > -static int of_dev_node_match(struct device *dev, void *data) > -{ > - return dev->of_node == data; > -} > - > /** > * of_find_device_by_node - Find the platform_device associated with a node > * @np: Pointer to device tree node > @@ -45,10 +40,10 @@ static int of_dev_node_match(struct device *dev, void *data) > */ > struct platform_device *of_find_device_by_node(struct device_node *np) > { > - struct device *dev; > - > - dev = bus_find_device(&platform_bus_type, NULL, np, of_dev_node_match); > - return dev ? to_platform_device(dev) : NULL; > + if (np->device && np->device->bus == &platform_bus_type && > + get_device(np->device)) > + return to_platform_device(np->device); > + return NULL; > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_find_device_by_node); > > @@ -192,6 +187,8 @@ static struct platform_device *of_platform_device_create_pdata( > goto err_clear_flag; > } > > + np->device = &dev->dev; > + > return dev; > > err_clear_flag: > @@ -272,6 +269,8 @@ static struct amba_device *of_amba_device_create(struct device_node *node, > goto err_free; > } > > + node->device = &dev->dev; > + > return dev; > > err_free: > @@ -476,6 +475,8 @@ static int of_platform_device_destroy(struct device *dev, void *data) > if (of_node_check_flag(dev->of_node, OF_POPULATED_BUS)) > device_for_each_child(dev, NULL, of_platform_device_destroy); > > + dev->of_node->device = NULL; > + > if (dev->bus == &platform_bus_type) > platform_device_unregister(to_platform_device(dev)); > #ifdef CONFIG_ARM_AMBA > diff --git a/include/linux/of.h b/include/linux/of.h > index 2194b8ca41f9..eb091be0f8ee 100644 > --- a/include/linux/of.h > +++ b/include/linux/of.h > @@ -52,6 +52,7 @@ struct device_node { > phandle phandle; > const char *full_name; > struct fwnode_handle fwnode; > + struct device *device; There are cases in which multiple device objects point to the same device_node, so is the single struct device pointer here really sufficient? > > struct property *properties; > struct property *deadprops; /* removed properties */ > Thanks, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists