[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151022092400.GL2508@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 11:24:00 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: "Wangnan (F)" <wangnan0@...wei.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, pi3orama <pi3orama@....com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>,
xiakaixu <xiakaixu@...wei.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
acme@...nel.org, mingo@...hat.com, masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com,
jolsa@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hekuang@...wei.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 1/1] bpf: control events stored in PERF_EVENT_ARRAY
maps trace data output when perf sampling
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 03:51:37PM +0800, Wangnan (F) wrote:
> Because I'm not very sure what the meaning of "inconsistent" in
> Peter's words...
What's inconsistent is that some perf actions can be done only on local
events while others can be done on !local.
And I can't say I particularly like having to pass in events from
userspace, but I think that Alexei convinced me that it made some sense
at some point in time.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists