[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5628C0DD.50900@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 18:56:29 +0800
From: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@...wei.com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Linux-sh list <linux-sh@...r.kernel.org>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>,
Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v6 3/3] arm: fix a migrating irq bug when hotplug cpu
On 2015/10/22 17:26, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 09:29:08PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 01:47:49PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>>> On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Yang Yingliang
>>> <yangyingliang@...wei.com> wrote:
>>>> When cpu is disabled, all irqs will be migratged to another cpu.
>>>> In some cases, a new affinity is different, the old affinity need
>>>> to be updated and if irq_set_affinity's return value is IRQ_SET_MASK_OK_DONE,
>>>> the old affinity can not be updated. Fix it by using irq_do_set_affinity.
>>>>
>>>> And migrating interrupts is a core code matter, so use the generic
>>>> function irq_migrate_all_off_this_cpu() to migrate interrupts in
>>>> kernel/irq/migration.c.
>>>>
>>>> Cc: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>
>>>> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
>>>> Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
>>>> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
>>>> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
>>>> Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
>>>> Cc: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@...wei.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> arch/arm/Kconfig | 1 +
>>>> arch/arm/include/asm/irq.h | 1 -
>>>> arch/arm/kernel/irq.c | 62 ----------------------------------------------
>>>> arch/arm/kernel/smp.c | 2 +-
>>>> 4 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig
>>>> index 72ad724..bffba78 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/arm/Kconfig
>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig
>>>> @@ -1492,6 +1492,7 @@ config NR_CPUS
>>>> config HOTPLUG_CPU
>>>> bool "Support for hot-pluggable CPUs"
>>>> depends on SMP
>>>> + select GENERIC_IRQ_MIGRATION
>>>
>>> This causes the following warnings during s2ram on r8a7791/koelsch
>>> (dual-core CA15):
>>
>> Thanks for the report. I'll see what tonight's boot run says for my
>> platforms. Hopefully, the author of these changes can help debug
>> this.
>
> What's happened is that:
>
> - c = irq_data_get_irq_chip(d);
> - if (!c->irq_set_affinity)
> - pr_debug("IRQ%u: unable to set affinity\n", d->irq);
>
> has become:
>
> + c = irq_data_get_irq_chip(d);
> + if (!c->irq_set_affinity) {
> + pr_warn_ratelimited("IRQ%u: unable to set affinity\n", d->irq);
>
> which makes things more noisy.
>
> This is a change that was not described in the commit message for the
> patch Thomas merged.
I described it in v2 cover letter and kept the change history in v6
cover letter. There is no comment on the change when patch the was
reviewing in v2, so I thought it's ok and I kept the change in the
next versions.
Need I send a patch to the Thomas branch to revert the change ?
Thanks,
Yang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists